[PATCH v4 03/14] drm/panthor: Add the device logical block

[Boris Brezillon]

On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 14:30:02 +0000
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau at arm.com> wrote:

> > +int panthor_device_init(struct panthor_device *ptdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct resource *res;
> > +	struct page *p;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ptdev->coherent = device_get_dma_attr(ptdev->base.dev) == DEV_DMA_COHERENT;
> > +
> > +	init_completion(&ptdev->unplug.done);
> > +	ret = drmm_mutex_init(&ptdev->base, &ptdev->unplug.lock);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = drmm_mutex_init(&ptdev->base, &ptdev->pm.mmio_lock);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	atomic_set(&ptdev->pm.state, PANTHOR_DEVICE_PM_STATE_SUSPENDED);
> > +	p = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> > +	if (!p)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	ptdev->pm.dummy_latest_flush = page_address(p);
> > +	ret = drmm_add_action_or_reset(&ptdev->base, panthor_device_free_page,
> > +				       ptdev->pm.dummy_latest_flush);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Set the dummy page holding the latest flush to 1. This will cause the
> > +	 * flush to avoided as we know it isn't necessary if the submission
> > +	 * happens while the dummy page is mapped. Zero cannot be used because
> > +	 * that means 'always flush'.
> > +	 */
> > +	*ptdev->pm.dummy_latest_flush = 1;
> > +
> > +	INIT_WORK(&ptdev->reset.work, panthor_device_reset_work);
> > +	ptdev->reset.wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("panthor-reset-wq", 0);
> > +	if (!ptdev->reset.wq)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	ret = drmm_add_action_or_reset(&ptdev->base, panthor_device_reset_cleanup, NULL);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = panthor_clk_init(ptdev);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = panthor_devfreq_init(ptdev);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	ptdev->iomem = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(to_platform_device(ptdev->base.dev),
> > +							      0, &res);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(ptdev->iomem))
> > +		return PTR_ERR(ptdev->iomem);
> > +
> > +	ptdev->phys_addr = res->start;
> > +
> > +	ret = devm_pm_runtime_enable(ptdev->base.dev);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(ptdev->base.dev);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = panthor_gpu_init(ptdev);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto err_rpm_put;
> > +
> > +	ret = panthor_mmu_init(ptdev);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto err_unplug_gpu;
> > +
> > +	ret = panthor_fw_init(ptdev);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto err_unplug_mmu;
> > +
> > +	ret = panthor_sched_init(ptdev);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto err_unplug_fw;
> > +
> > +	/* ~3 frames */
> > +	pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(ptdev->base.dev, 50);
> > +
> > +	ret = drm_dev_register(&ptdev->base, 0);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto err_unplug_sched;  
> 
> For sake of replicating the panthor_device_unplus() calls, should we do
> here:
> 
> 	if (ret) {
> 		pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(ptdev->base.dev);

But pm_runtime_use_autosuspend() is called after that, why do we need
to call pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() here?

> 		goto err_unplug_sched;
> 	}
> 
> 
> > +
> > +	pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(ptdev->base.dev);
> > +	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(ptdev->base.dev);
> > +	return 0;
> > +
> > +err_unplug_sched:
> > +	panthor_sched_unplug(ptdev);
> > +
> > +err_unplug_fw:
> > +	panthor_fw_unplug(ptdev);
> > +
> > +err_unplug_mmu:
> > +	panthor_mmu_unplug(ptdev);
> > +
> > +err_unplug_gpu:
> > +	panthor_gpu_unplug(ptdev);
> > +
> > +err_rpm_put:
> > +	pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(ptdev->base.dev);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}