[PATCH v2 resend 0/4] of: replace of_graph_get_next_endpoint()

[Kuninori Morimoto]

Hi Rob

> This is resend v2 of replace of_graph_get_next_endpoint()
> 
> We should get rid of or minimize of_graph_get_next_endpoint() in
> its current form. In general, drivers should be asking for a specific 
> port number because their function is fixed in the binding.
> 
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131184347.GA1906672-robh@kernel.org
> 
> This patch-set replace of_graph_get_next_endpoint() by
> of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(). There are still next_endpoint()
> after this patch-set, but it will be replaced by
> for_each_endpoint_of_node() in next patch-set (A)
> 
> [*] this patch-set
> [o] done
> 
> 	[o] tidyup of_graph_get_endpoint_count()
> 	[*] replace endpoint func - use endpoint_by_regs()
> (A)	[ ] replace endpoint func - use for_each()
> 	[ ] rename endpoint func to device_endpoint
> 	[ ] add new port function
> 	[ ] add new endpont function
> 	[ ] remove of_graph_get_next_device_endpoint()
> 
> v1 -> v2
> 	- add Reviewed-by from Launrent
> 	- use by_regs(xx, -1, -1) for some devices
> 	- add extra explain for drm_of_get_dsi_bus()
> 	- add FIXME and Link on adv7604.c
> 	- based on latest of branch
> 
> Kuninori Morimoto (4):
>   gpu: drm: replace of_graph_get_next_endpoint()
>   media: i2c: replace of_graph_get_next_endpoint()
>   media: platform: replace of_graph_get_next_endpoint()
>   video: fbdev: replace of_graph_get_next_endpoint()

I wonder who should handle this patch-set ??
I'm posting these as part of "of patch-set" (= to Rob)
but does these should be handled by each driver maintainer ?
(I believe all maintainers are listed on To)

Thank you for your help !!

Best regards
---
Renesas Electronics
Ph.D. Kuninori Morimoto