[PATCH libdrm 1/2] amdgpu: fix parameter of amdgpu_cs_ctx_create2
Christian König
christian.koenig at amd.com
Mon Jan 8 16:28:30 UTC 2024
Am 08.01.24 um 10:40 schrieb Zhenneng Li:
> In order to pass the correct priority parameter to the kernel,
> we must change priority type from uint32_t to int32_t.
Hui what? Why should it matter if the parameter is signed or not?
That doesn't seem to make sense.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenneng Li <lizhenneng at kylinos.cn>
> ---
> amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 2 +-
> amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/amdgpu/amdgpu.h b/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> index 9bdbf366..f46753f3 100644
> --- a/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> +++ b/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> @@ -896,7 +896,7 @@ int amdgpu_bo_list_update(amdgpu_bo_list_handle handle,
> *
> */
> int amdgpu_cs_ctx_create2(amdgpu_device_handle dev,
> - uint32_t priority,
> + int32_t priority,
> amdgpu_context_handle *context);
> /**
> * Create GPU execution Context
> diff --git a/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c b/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> index 49fc16c3..eb72c638 100644
> --- a/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> +++ b/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_reset_sem(amdgpu_semaphore_handle sem);
> * \return 0 on success otherwise POSIX Error code
> */
> drm_public int amdgpu_cs_ctx_create2(amdgpu_device_handle dev,
> - uint32_t priority,
> + int32_t priority,
> amdgpu_context_handle *context)
> {
> struct amdgpu_context *gpu_context;
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list