[PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: gpu: Rename img,powervr to img,powervr-rogue

[Andrew Davis]

On 1/9/24 1:17 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 09/01/2024 20:04, Andrew Davis wrote:
>> On 1/9/24 12:59 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 09/01/2024 18:19, Andrew Davis wrote:
>>>> This binding will be used for GPUs starting from Series6 (Rogue)
>>>> and later. A different binding document will describe Series5.
>>>> With that the name "img,powervr" is too generic, rename to
>>>> "img,powervr-rogue" to avoid confusion.
>>>>
>>>> Suggested-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard at kernel.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd at ti.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm at redhat.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Frank Binns <frank.binns at imgtec.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Why do you send new version while we still talk about previous?
>>>
>>> Please implement feedback from v1 (and this is v2, so next is v3) or
>>> keep discussing.
>>>
>>
>> I agreed with everything you said in the last round (RFC v2) and
>> made all requested changes. Did I miss something in this version?
> 
> The recommendation is that naming of the file matches generic compatible
> and your file has only one generic compatible. Therefore I don't
> understand why you claimed there are multiple compatibles.
> 

I said "There are (or will be) multiple compatible strings", the rest
are on the way. So I didn't want to make this file less generic when
other bindings are almost ready.

Frank, can you help here, I'm assuming you have "img,img-bxs" and
"img,img-8xe" bindings staged for upstreaming somewhere; you'll be
putting those in this same file, right?

Thanks,
Andrew

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>