[PATCH 3/5] drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v6

[Lucas De Marchi]

On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 04:16:58PM -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 05:38:16PM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>>
>>On 1/17/24 13:27, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>>>
>>>On 1/17/24 11:47, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>>>>Hi, Christian
>>>>
>>>>Xe changes look good. Will send the series to xe ci to check for 
>>>>regressions.
>>>
>>>Hmm, there are some checkpatch warnings about author / SOB email 
>>>mismatch,
>>
>>With those fixed, this patch is
>>
>>Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
>
>
>it actually broke drm-tip now that this is merged:
>
>../drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:41:10: error: ‘struct ttm_placement’ has no member named ‘num_busy_placement’; did you mean ‘num_placement’
>   41 |         .num_busy_placement = 1,
>      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>      |          num_placement
>../drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:41:31: error: excess elements in struct initializer [-Werror]
>   41 |         .num_busy_placement = 1,
>      |                               ^
>
>
>Apparently a conflict with another patch that got applied a few days
>ago: a201c6ee37d6 ("drm/xe/bo: Evict VRAM to TT rather than to system")

oh, no... apparently that commit is  from a long time ago. The problem
was that drm-misc-next was not yet in sync with drm-next. Thomas, do you
have a fixup for this to put in rerere?

Lucas De Marchi