[PATCH v2] misc: fastrpc: Add support for multiple PD from one process

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 09:16:11AM GMT, Ekansh Gupta wrote:
> Memory intensive applications(which requires more tha 4GB) that wants
> to offload tasks to DSP might have to split the tasks to multiple
> user PD to make the resources available.
> 
> For every call to DSP, fastrpc driver passes the process tgid which
> works as an identifier for the DSP to enqueue the tasks to specific PD.
> With current design, if any process opens device node more than once
> and makes PD initmrequest, same tgid will be passed to DSP which will
> be considered a bad request and this will result in failure as the same
> identifier cannot be used for multiple DSP PD.
> 
> Allocate and pass an effective pgid to DSP which would be allocated

effective pgid makes me think about the setegid() system call. Can we
just name them "client ID" (granted that session is already reserved)?
Or is it really session ID? Can we use the index of the session instead
and skip the whole IDR allocation?

> during device open and will have a lifetime till the device is closed.
> This will allow the same process to open the device more than once and
> spawn multiple dynamic PD for ease of processing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <quic_ekangupt at quicinc.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>   - Reformatted commit text.
>   - Moved from ida to idr.
>   - Changed dsp_pgid data type.
>   - Resolved memory leak.
> 
>  drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> index a7a2bcedb37e..b4a5af2d2dfa 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> @@ -105,6 +105,10 @@
>  
>  #define miscdev_to_fdevice(d) container_of(d, struct fastrpc_device, miscdev)
>  
> +#define MAX_DSP_PD	64	/* Maximum 64 PDs are allowed on DSP */

Why?

> +#define MIN_FRPC_PGID	1000

Is it some random number or some pre-defined constant? Can we use 0
instead?

> +#define MAX_FRPC_PGID	(MIN_FRPC_PGID + MAX_DSP_PD)
> +
>  static const char *domains[FASTRPC_DEV_MAX] = { "adsp", "mdsp",
>  						"sdsp", "cdsp"};
>  struct fastrpc_phy_page {


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry