[PATCH net-next v10 10/14] net: add support for skbs with unreadable frags

[Mina Almasry]

On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 9:49 AM Mina Almasry <almasrymina at google.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 3:46 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2024-05-30 at 20:16 +0000, Mina Almasry wrote:
> > > diff --git a/net/core/gro.c b/net/core/gro.c
> > > index 26f09c3e830b7..7b9d018f552bd 100644
> > > --- a/net/core/gro.c
> > > +++ b/net/core/gro.c
> > > @@ -422,6 +422,9 @@ static void gro_pull_from_frag0(struct sk_buff *skb, int grow)
> > >  {
> > >       struct skb_shared_info *pinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
> > >
> > > +     if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!skb_frags_readable(skb)))
> > > +             return;
> > > +
> > >       BUG_ON(skb->end - skb->tail < grow);
> > >
> > >       memcpy(skb_tail_pointer(skb), NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->frag0, grow);
> > > @@ -443,7 +446,7 @@ static void gro_try_pull_from_frag0(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > >  {
> > >       int grow = skb_gro_offset(skb) - skb_headlen(skb);
> > >
> > > -     if (grow > 0)
> > > +     if (grow > 0 && skb_frags_readable(skb))
> > >               gro_pull_from_frag0(skb, grow);
> > >  }
> >
> > I'm unsure if this was already mentioned, so please pardon the eventual
> > duplicate...
> >
> > The above code is quite critical performance wise, and the previous
> > patch already prevent frag0 from being set to a non paged frag,
>
>
> Hi Paolo!
>
> The last patch, d4d25dd237a61 ("net: support non paged skb frags"),
> AFAICT doesn't prevent frag0 from being a non-paged frag. What we do
> is set ->frag0=skb->data, then prevent it from being reset to
> skb_frag_address() for non-paged skbs. ->frag0 will likely actually be
> a bad value for non-paged frags, so we need to check in
> gro_pul_from_frag0() so that we don't accidentally pull from a bad
> ->frag0 value.
>
> What I think I should do here is what you said. I should make sure
> frag0 and frag0_len is not set if it's a non-paged frag. Then, we
> don't need special checks in gro_pull_from_frag0 I think, because
> skb_gro_may_pull() should detect that frag0_len is 0 and should
> prevent a pull.
>
> I will apply this fix to the next iteration for your review. Let me
> know if I missed something.
>
>

Actually, sorry you're right. As written, d4d25dd237a61 ("net: support
non paged skb frags") prevents frag0 from being a non-paged frag. I
can just drop these excessive checks with no downside. Sorry for the
noise!

-- 
Thanks,
Mina