[PATCH v2] drm/panel : truly-nt35521: transition to mipi_dsi wrapped functions

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 08:57:48AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 7:44 AM Tejas Vipin <tejasvipin76 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Use functions introduced in commit 966e397e4f60 ("drm/mipi-dsi: Introduce
> > mipi_dsi_*_write_seq_multi()") and commit f79d6d28d8fe
> > ("drm/mipi-dsi: wrap more functions for streamline handling") for the
> > sony tulip truly nt35521 panel.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tejas Vipin <tejasvipin76 at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> >     - Fix patch format
> >     - Fix code style
> >
> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/485eef24-ddad-466a-a89f-f9f226801bb7@gmail.com/
> >
> > ---
> >  .../panel/panel-sony-tulip-truly-nt35521.c    | 435 +++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 209 insertions(+), 226 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sony-tulip-truly-nt35521.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sony-tulip-truly-nt35521.c
> > index 6d44970dccd9..5a050352c207 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sony-tulip-truly-nt35521.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sony-tulip-truly-nt35521.c
> > @@ -44,248 +44,231 @@ static void truly_nt35521_reset(struct truly_nt35521 *ctx)
> >  static int truly_nt35521_on(struct truly_nt35521 *ctx)
> >  {
> >         struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ctx->dsi;
> > -       struct device *dev = &dsi->dev;
> > -       int ret;
> > +
> > +       struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = dsi };
> 
> It's not a huge deal, but normally in the kernel all the variable
> declarations are cuddled together. AKA no blank line between the
> declaration of "dsi" and the declaration of "dsi_ctx". It would be
> awesome if you could send a v3 fixing that. When you send v3, feel
> free to add this above your own Signed-off-by:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders at chromium.org>
> 
> ...with that, the patch will probably sit on the mailing lists for a
> week or two and then get applied. Neil may want to apply it, but if
> he's busy I can do it too.
> 
> I believe you were planning on tackling some more of the panels. Since
> you're still getting started sending patches, maybe keep it to a
> smaller batch for now and send another 10 or so? Probably best to keep
> it as one panel driver per patch.
> 
> -Doug

Do we want to delay this until the mipi_dsi_msleep() is fixed?


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry