[v4,1/2] drm/bridge: sii902x: Fix mode_valid hook
Jayesh Choudhary
j-choudhary at ti.com
Wed Jun 12 05:21:55 UTC 2024
Hello Sui, Sam!
Thanks for the review.
(Sorry for delayed response. I was OoO last week)
On 31/05/24 19:34, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> Hi, Jayesh
>
>
> On 5/31/24 21:33, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> Hi Jayesh,
>>
>>>> +
>>>> static const struct drm_bridge_funcs sii902x_bridge_funcs = {
>>>> .attach = sii902x_bridge_attach,
>>>> .mode_set = sii902x_bridge_mode_set,
>>>> @@ -516,6 +529,7 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_funcs
>>>> sii902x_bridge_funcs = {
>>>> .atomic_destroy_state = drm_atomic_helper_bridge_destroy_state,
>>>> .atomic_get_input_bus_fmts =
>>>> sii902x_bridge_atomic_get_input_bus_fmts,
>>>> .atomic_check = sii902x_bridge_atomic_check,
>>>> + .mode_valid = sii902x_bridge_mode_valid,
>>
>> As you have the possibility to test the driver, it would be nice with a
>> follow-up patch that replaces the use of enable() / disable() with the
>> atomic counterparts.
>>
>> enable() / disable() are deprecated, so it is nice to reduce their use.
>
> I agree with Sam.
>
> Please using atomic uniformally with a follow-up patch, the mixed
> using of atomic API and non atomic API is a little bit confusing IMO.
>
>
I will change the enable and disable to their atomic counter parts in
the next revision.
Warm Regards,
-Jayesh
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list