[PATCH v2] drm/panel : truly-nt35521: transition to mipi_dsi wrapped functions

[neil.armstrong at linaro.org]

On 11/06/2024 23:12, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 2:10 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
> <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 08:57:48AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 7:44 AM Tejas Vipin <tejasvipin76 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Use functions introduced in commit 966e397e4f60 ("drm/mipi-dsi: Introduce
>>>> mipi_dsi_*_write_seq_multi()") and commit f79d6d28d8fe
>>>> ("drm/mipi-dsi: wrap more functions for streamline handling") for the
>>>> sony tulip truly nt35521 panel.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tejas Vipin <tejasvipin76 at gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>>      - Fix patch format
>>>>      - Fix code style
>>>>
>>>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/485eef24-ddad-466a-a89f-f9f226801bb7@gmail.com/
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>   .../panel/panel-sony-tulip-truly-nt35521.c    | 435 +++++++++---------
>>>>   1 file changed, 209 insertions(+), 226 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sony-tulip-truly-nt35521.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sony-tulip-truly-nt35521.c
>>>> index 6d44970dccd9..5a050352c207 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sony-tulip-truly-nt35521.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sony-tulip-truly-nt35521.c
>>>> @@ -44,248 +44,231 @@ static void truly_nt35521_reset(struct truly_nt35521 *ctx)
>>>>   static int truly_nt35521_on(struct truly_nt35521 *ctx)
>>>>   {
>>>>          struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ctx->dsi;
>>>> -       struct device *dev = &dsi->dev;
>>>> -       int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +       struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = dsi };
>>>
>>> It's not a huge deal, but normally in the kernel all the variable
>>> declarations are cuddled together. AKA no blank line between the
>>> declaration of "dsi" and the declaration of "dsi_ctx". It would be
>>> awesome if you could send a v3 fixing that. When you send v3, feel
>>> free to add this above your own Signed-off-by:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders at chromium.org>
>>>
>>> ...with that, the patch will probably sit on the mailing lists for a
>>> week or two and then get applied. Neil may want to apply it, but if
>>> he's busy I can do it too.
>>>
>>> I believe you were planning on tackling some more of the panels. Since
>>> you're still getting started sending patches, maybe keep it to a
>>> smaller batch for now and send another 10 or so? Probably best to keep
>>> it as one panel driver per patch.
>>>
>>> -Doug
>>
>> Do we want to delay this until the mipi_dsi_msleep() is fixed?
> 
> Yeah, that's a good point. I saw the mipi_dsi_msleep() problem after I
> reviewed this patch, but you're right that it should be fixed first.

Yeah it should wait after mipi_dsi_msleep is fixed.

Neil

> 
> -Doug