[RFC] GPU driver with separate "core" and "DRM" modules

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Tue Jun 18 09:31:10 UTC 2024


On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 04:23:17AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On 17/6/24 23:55, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 03:02:09AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > > NVIDIA has been exploring ways to better support the effort for an
> > > upstream kernel mode driver for GPUs that are capable of running GSP-RM
> > > firmware, since the introduction[1] to Nova.
> > > 
> > > Use cases have been identified for which separating the core GPU
> > > programming out of the full DRM driver stack is a strong requirement
> > > from our key customers.
> > > 
> > > An upstreamed NVIDIA GPU driver should be able to support current and
> > > emerging customer use cases for vGPU hosts.  NVIDIA's vGPU deployments
> > > to date do not support compute or graphics functionality within the
> > > hypervisor host, and have no dependency on the Linux graphics subsystem,
> > > instead implementing the minimal functionality required to run vGPU
> > > guest VMs.
> > > 
> > > For security-sensitive environments such as cloud infrastructure, it's
> > > important to continue support for running a minimal footprint vGPU host
> > > driver in a stripped-down / barebones kernel environment.
> > > 
> > > This can be achieved by supporting both VFIO and DRM drivers as clients
> > > of a core driver, without requiring a full-fledged DRM driver (or the
> > > DRM subsystem itself) to be built into the host kernel.
> > > 
> > > A core driver would be responsible for booting and communicating with
> > > GSP-RM, enumeration of HW configuration, shared/partitioned resource
> > > management, exception handling, and event dispatch.
> > > 
> > > The DRM driver would do all the standard things a DRM driver does, and
> > > implement GPU memory management (TTM/HMM), KMS, command submission etc,
> > > as well as providing UAPI for userspace clients.  These features would
> > > be implemented using HW resources allocated from a core driver, rather
> > > than the DRM driver being directly responsible for HW programming.
> > > 
> > > As Nouveau's KMD is already split (in the logical sense) along similar
> > > lines, we're using it here for the purposes of this RFC to demonstrate
> > > the feasibility of such an architecture, and open it up for discussion.
> > Sounds reasonable.
> > 
> > Only bikeshed I have to add is that the blessed way (according to the cool
> > kernel maintainers at least or something) to structure this is using
> > auxbus. Definitely when you end up with more than one driver binding to
> > the core (like maybe some system management interface thing, or perhaps a
> > special compute-only kernel driver).
> > 
> > https://dri.freedesktop.org/docs/drm/driver-api/auxiliary_bus.html
> 
> Hey!
> 
> Yes indeed.  I sent this[1] series at the same time, which was initially
> written to so that nouveau.ko would still get auto-loaded alongside nvkm.ko.
> 
> Ben.
> 
> 
> [1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/2024-June/044861.html

Oh I missed that you've already typed up the aux bus conversion somewhere.
I guess just land it all :-)
-Sima

> 
> 
> > 
> > Cheers, Sima
> > 
> > > A link[2] to a tree containing the patches is below.
> > > 
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/3ed356488c9b0ca93845501425d427309f4cf616.camel@redhat.com/
> > > [2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/bskeggs/nouveau/-/tree/00.03-module
> > > 
> > > *** BLURB HERE ***
> > > 
> > > Ben Skeggs (2):
> > >    drm/nouveau/nvkm: export symbols needed by the drm driver
> > >    drm/nouveau/nvkm: separate out into nvkm.ko
> > > 
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/Kbuild                      |  4 ++--
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/module.h  |  3 ---
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c               | 10 +---------
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/driver.c          |  1 +
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/gpuobj.c          |  2 ++
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/mm.c              |  4 ++++
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/device/acpi.c          |  1 +
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/base.c       |  1 +
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/module.c               |  8 ++++++--
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/init.c     |  1 +
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/pll.c      |  1 +
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/base.c       |  3 +++
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gpio/base.c     |  3 +++
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/i2c/base.c      |  2 ++
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/i2c/bus.c       |  1 +
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/iccsense/base.c |  1 +
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/base.c    |  1 +
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/fan.c     |  1 +
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/volt/base.c     |  1 +
> > >   19 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > 2.44.0
> > > 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch


More information about the dri-devel mailing list