[RFC PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: check ubwc support before adding compressed formats
Rob Clark
robdclark at gmail.com
Thu Jun 27 21:13:38 UTC 2024
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 1:53 PM Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com> wrote:
>
> On QCM2290 chipset DPU does not support UBWC.
>
> Add a dpu cap to indicate this and do not expose compressed formats
> in this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_5_qcm2290.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 5 ++++-
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_5_qcm2290.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_5_qcm2290.h
> index 3cbb2fe8aba2..6671f798bacc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_5_qcm2290.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_5_qcm2290.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ static const struct dpu_caps qcm2290_dpu_caps = {
> .max_mixer_blendstages = 0x4,
> .has_dim_layer = true,
> .has_idle_pc = true,
> + .has_no_ubwc = true,
> .max_linewidth = 2160,
> .pixel_ram_size = DEFAULT_PIXEL_RAM_SIZE,
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> index af2ead1c4886..676d0a283922 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> @@ -342,6 +342,7 @@ struct dpu_rotation_cfg {
> * @has_dim_layer dim layer feature status
> * @has_idle_pc indicate if idle power collapse feature is supported
> * @has_3d_merge indicate if 3D merge is supported
> + * @has_no_ubwc indicate if UBWC is supported
> * @max_linewidth max linewidth for sspp
> * @pixel_ram_size size of latency hiding and de-tiling buffer in bytes
> * @max_hdeci_exp max horizontal decimation supported (max is 2^value)
> @@ -354,6 +355,7 @@ struct dpu_caps {
> bool has_dim_layer;
> bool has_idle_pc;
> bool has_3d_merge;
> + bool has_no_ubwc;
has_no_ubwc sounds kinda awkward compared to has_ubwc. But I guess
you wanted to avoid all that churn..
How about instead, if msm_mdss_data::ubwc_{enc,dec}_version are zero,
then we know there is no ubwc support in the display.
BR,
-R
> /* SSPP limits */
> u32 max_linewidth;
> u32 pixel_ram_size;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> index 6000e84598c2..31fe0fc4c02e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> @@ -1341,10 +1341,13 @@ void dpu_plane_danger_signal_ctrl(struct drm_plane *plane, bool enable)
> static bool dpu_plane_format_mod_supported(struct drm_plane *plane,
> uint32_t format, uint64_t modifier)
> {
> + struct dpu_plane *pdpu = to_dpu_plane(plane);
> + const struct dpu_caps *caps = pdpu->catalog->caps;
> +
> if (modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR)
> return true;
>
> - if (modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_QCOM_COMPRESSED)
> + if (modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_QCOM_COMPRESSED && !caps->has_no_ubwc)
> return dpu_find_format(format, qcom_compressed_supported_formats,
> ARRAY_SIZE(qcom_compressed_supported_formats));
>
> --
> 2.44.0
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list