[PATCH v7 3/6] iio: core: Add new DMABUF interface infrastructure

Christian König christian.koenig at amd.com
Mon Mar 4 13:41:44 UTC 2024


Trying to send this once more as text only.

Am 04.03.24 um 14:40 schrieb Christian König:
> Am 04.03.24 um 14:28 schrieb Nuno Sá:
>> On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 13:44 +0100, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 23.02.24 um 13:14 schrieb Nuno Sa:
>>>> From: Paul Cercueil<paul at crapouillou.net>
>>>>
>>>> Add the necessary infrastructure to the IIO core to support a new
>>>> optional DMABUF based interface.
>>>>
>>>> With this new interface, DMABUF objects (externally created) can be
>>>> attached to a IIO buffer, and subsequently used for data transfer.
>>>>
>>>> A userspace application can then use this interface to share DMABUF
>>>> objects between several interfaces, allowing it to transfer data in a
>>>> zero-copy fashion, for instance between IIO and the USB stack.
>>>>
>>>> The userspace application can also memory-map the DMABUF objects, and
>>>> access the sample data directly. The advantage of doing this vs. the
>>>> read() interface is that it avoids an extra copy of the data between the
>>>> kernel and userspace. This is particularly userful for high-speed
>>>> devices which produce several megabytes or even gigabytes of data per
>>>> second.
>>>>
>>>> As part of the interface, 3 new IOCTLs have been added:
>>>>
>>>> IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_ATTACH_IOCTL(int fd):
>>>>    Attach the DMABUF object identified by the given file descriptor to the
>>>>    buffer.
>>>>
>>>> IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_DETACH_IOCTL(int fd):
>>>>    Detach the DMABUF object identified by the given file descriptor from
>>>>    the buffer. Note that closing the IIO buffer's file descriptor will
>>>>    automatically detach all previously attached DMABUF objects.
>>>>
>>>> IIO_BUFFER_DMABUF_ENQUEUE_IOCTL(struct iio_dmabuf *):
>>>>    Request a data transfer to/from the given DMABUF object. Its file
>>>>    descriptor, as well as the transfer size and flags are provided in the
>>>>    "iio_dmabuf" structure.
>>>>
>>>> These three IOCTLs have to be performed on the IIO buffer's file
>>>> descriptor, obtained using the IIO_BUFFER_GET_FD_IOCTL() ioctl.
>>> A few nit picks and one bug below, apart from that looks good to me.
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> Thanks for looking at it. I'll just add some comment on the bug below and for
>> the other stuff I hope Paul is already able to step in and reply to it. My
>> assumption (which seems to be wrong) is that the dmabuf bits should be already
>> good to go as they should be pretty similar to the USB part of it.
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>> +	if (dma_to_ram) {
>>>> +		/*
>>>> +		 * If we're writing to the DMABUF, make sure we don't have
>>>> +		 * readers
>>>> +		 */
>>>> +		retl = dma_resv_wait_timeout(dmabuf->resv,
>>>> +					     DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ, true,
>>>> +					     timeout);
>>>> +		if (retl == 0)
>>>> +			retl = -EBUSY;
>>>> +		if (retl < 0) {
>>>> +			ret = (int)retl;
>>>> +			goto err_resv_unlock;
>>>> +		}
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (buffer->access->lock_queue)
>>>> +		buffer->access->lock_queue(buffer);
>>>> +
>>>> +	ret = dma_resv_reserve_fences(dmabuf->resv, 1);
>>>> +	if (ret)
>>>> +		goto err_queue_unlock;
>>>> +
>>>> +	dma_resv_add_fence(dmabuf->resv, &fence->base,
>>>> +			   dma_resv_usage_rw(dma_to_ram));
>>> That is incorrect use of the function dma_resv_usage_rw(). That function
>>> is for retrieving fences and not adding them.
>>>
>>> See the function implementation and comments, when you use it like this
>>> you get exactly what you don't want.
>>>
>> Does that mean that the USB stuff [1] is also wrong?
>>
>> [1]:https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/tree/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c?h=usb-next#n1669
>
> Yes, that's broken as well. The dma_resv_usage_rw() function is 
> supposed to be used while retrieving fences.
>
> In other words your "if (dma_to_ram) ..." above is incorrect as well. 
> That one should look more like this:
> /*
>   * Writes needs to wait for other writes and reads, but readers only have to wait for writers.
>   */
>
> retl = dma_resv_wait_timeout(dmabuf->resv, dma_resv_usage_rw(dma_to_ram), timeout);
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>> - Nuno Sá
>>
>>
>



More information about the dri-devel mailing list