[v7 3/7] arm64: defconfig: Enable HIMAX_HX83102 panel

[Doug Anderson]

Hi,

On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 2:16 PM <neil.armstrong at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 15/05/2024 03:46, Cong Yang wrote:
> > DRM_PANEL_HIMAX_HX83102 is being split out from DRM_PANEL_BOE_TV101WUM_NL6.
> > Since the arm64 defconfig had the BOE panel driver enabled, let's also
> > enable the himax driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cong Yang <yangcong5 at huaqin.corp-partner.google.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders at chromium.org>
> > ---
> >   arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 +
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> > index 2c30d617e180..687c86ddaece 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> > @@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BOE_TV101WUM_NL6=m
> >   CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_LVDS=m
> >   CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SIMPLE=m
> >   CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_EDP=m
> > +CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_HIMAX_HX83102=m
> >   CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_ILITEK_ILI9882T=m
> >   CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_MANTIX_MLAF057WE51=m
> >   CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_RAYDIUM_RM67191=m
>
> You should probably sent this one separately since only an ARM SoC maintainer
> can apply this, probably via the qcom tree.

Really? I always kinda figured that this was a bit like MAINTAINERS
where it can come through a bunch of different trees. Certainly I've
landed changes to it before through the drm-misc tree. If that was
wrong then I'll certainly stop doing it, of course.

-Doug