[PATCH v3] drm/etnaviv: Request pages from DMA32 zone on addressing_limited
Sui Jingfeng
sui.jingfeng at linux.dev
Sat Nov 2 15:24:31 UTC 2024
Hi,
I forget to mention that the commit title should be "on addressing limited devices",
the underscore between the last two words is not necessary. It's a typo when reply
email.
On 2024/10/1 20:32, xiaolei wang wrote:
>
>
> On 10/1/24 20:17, Lucas Stach wrote:
>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>>
>> Hi Xiaolei,
>>
>> Am Dienstag, dem 03.09.2024 um 10:08 +0800 schrieb Xiaolei Wang:
>>> Remove __GFP_HIGHMEM when requesting a page from DMA32 zone,
>>> and since all vivante GPUs in the system will share the same
>>> DMA constraints, move the check of whether to get a page from
>>> DMA32 to etnaviv_bind().
>>>
>>> Fixes: b72af445cd38 ("drm/etnaviv: request pages from DMA32 zone when needed")
>>> Suggested-by: Sui Jingfeng<sui.jingfeng at linux.dev>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Wang<xiaolei.wang at windriver.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> change log
>>>
>>> v1:
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/20240806104733.2018783-1-xiaolei.wang@windriver.com/
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> Modify the issue of not retaining GFP_USER in v1 and update the commit log.
>>>
>>> v3:
>>> Use "priv->shm_gfp_mask = GFP_USER | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOWARN;"
>>> instead of
>>> "priv->shm_gfp_mask = GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOWARN;"
>> I don't understand this part of the changes in the new version. Why
>> should we drop the HIGHMEM bit always and not only in the case where
>> dma addressing is limited? This seems overly restrictive.
>
> Makes sense, thanks for your reminder, I will drop the HIGHMEM bit
> when the next version has address limit
>
> if (dma_addressing_limited(gpu->dev)) {
> priv->shm_gfp_mask |= GFP_DMA32;
> priv->shm_gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_HIGHMEM;
> }
>
> thanks
>
> xiaolei
>
>> Regards,
>> Lucas
>>
>>> and move the check of whether to get a page from DMA32 to etnaviv_bind().
>>>
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_drv.c | 10 +++++++++-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.c | 8 --------
>>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_drv.c
>>> index 6500f3999c5f..8cb2c3ec8e5d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_drv.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_drv.c
>>> @@ -536,7 +536,15 @@ static int etnaviv_bind(struct device *dev)
>>> mutex_init(&priv->gem_lock);
>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->gem_list);
>>> priv->num_gpus = 0;
>>> - priv->shm_gfp_mask = GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOWARN;
>>> + priv->shm_gfp_mask = GFP_USER | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOWARN;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * If the GPU is part of a system with DMA addressing limitations,
>>> + * request pages for our SHM backend buffers from the DMA32 zone to
>>> + * hopefully avoid performance killing SWIOTLB bounce buffering.
>>> + */
>>> + if (dma_addressing_limited(dev))
>>> + priv->shm_gfp_mask |= GFP_DMA32;
>>>
>>> priv->cmdbuf_suballoc = etnaviv_cmdbuf_suballoc_new(drm->dev);
>>> if (IS_ERR(priv->cmdbuf_suballoc)) {
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.c
>>> index 7c7f97793ddd..5e753dd42f72 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gpu.c
>>> @@ -839,14 +839,6 @@ int etnaviv_gpu_init(struct etnaviv_gpu *gpu)
>>> if (ret)
>>> goto fail;
>>>
>>> - /*
>>> - * If the GPU is part of a system with DMA addressing limitations,
>>> - * request pages for our SHM backend buffers from the DMA32 zone to
>>> - * hopefully avoid performance killing SWIOTLB bounce buffering.
>>> - */
>>> - if (dma_addressing_limited(gpu->dev))
>>> - priv->shm_gfp_mask |= GFP_DMA32;
>>> -
>>> /* Create buffer: */
>>> ret = etnaviv_cmdbuf_init(priv->cmdbuf_suballoc, &gpu->buffer,
>>> PAGE_SIZE);
--
Best regards,
Sui
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list