[PATCH 09/10] drm/xe/nvm: add on-die non-volatile memory device
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Mon Nov 4 21:22:20 UTC 2024
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 10:48:48AM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 01:41:18PM +0300, Alexander Usyskin wrote:
> > Enable access to internal non-volatile memory on DGFX
> > with GSC/CSC devices via a child device.
> > The nvm child device is exposed via auxiliary bus.
>
> I looked at all of the i915 and xe patches here and everything looks right.
> Just a few common doubts before I put my rv-b here below...
>
>
> Starting with the one from the other patch. Could you please share some doc
> where I could confirm
> HECI_FW_STATUS_2_NVM_ACCESS_MODE bit?
>
> more below...
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 3 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 8 +++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_nvm.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_nvm.h | 15 ++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c | 5 ++
> > 6 files changed, 132 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_nvm.c
> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_nvm.h
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > index cb6c625bdef0..4225a654a937 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ xe-y += xe_bb.o \
> > xe_ring_ops.o \
> > xe_sa.o \
> > xe_sched_job.o \
> > + xe_nvm.o \
> > xe_step.o \
> > xe_sync.o \
> > xe_tile.o \
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> > index 962751c966d1..844697f79eee 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> > @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
> > #include "xe_pcode.h"
> > #include "xe_pm.h"
> > #include "xe_query.h"
> > +#include "xe_nvm.h"
> > #include "xe_sriov.h"
> > #include "xe_tile.h"
> > #include "xe_ttm_stolen_mgr.h"
> > @@ -743,6 +744,7 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
> > goto err_fini_gt;
> > }
> >
> > + xe_nvm_init(xe);
> > xe_heci_gsc_init(xe);
> >
> > err = xe_oa_init(xe);
> > @@ -811,6 +813,7 @@ void xe_device_remove(struct xe_device *xe)
> > xe_oa_fini(xe);
> >
> > xe_heci_gsc_fini(xe);
> > + xe_nvm_fini(xe);
> >
> > for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
> > xe_gt_remove(gt);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> > index 85bede4dd646..ec3d82f05519 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
> > @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
> > struct xe_ggtt;
> > struct xe_pat_ops;
> >
> > +struct intel_dg_nvm_dev;
> > +
> > #define XE_BO_INVALID_OFFSET LONG_MAX
> >
> > #define GRAPHICS_VER(xe) ((xe)->info.graphics_verx100 / 100)
> > @@ -44,6 +46,7 @@ struct xe_pat_ops;
> > #define IS_DGFX(xe) ((xe)->info.is_dgfx)
> > #define HAS_HECI_GSCFI(xe) ((xe)->info.has_heci_gscfi)
> > #define HAS_HECI_CSCFI(xe) ((xe)->info.has_heci_cscfi)
> > +#define HAS_GSC_NVM(xe) ((xe)->info.has_gsc_nvm)
> >
> > #define XE_VRAM_FLAGS_NEED64K BIT(0)
> >
> > @@ -331,6 +334,8 @@ struct xe_device {
> > u8 has_heci_gscfi:1;
> > /** @info.has_heci_cscfi: device has heci cscfi */
> > u8 has_heci_cscfi:1;
> > + /** @info.has_gsc_nvm: device has gsc non-volatile memory */
> > + u8 has_gsc_nvm:1;
> > /** @info.skip_guc_pc: Skip GuC based PM feature init */
> > u8 skip_guc_pc:1;
> > /** @info.has_atomic_enable_pte_bit: Device has atomic enable PTE bit */
> > @@ -502,6 +507,9 @@ struct xe_device {
> > /** @heci_gsc: graphics security controller */
> > struct xe_heci_gsc heci_gsc;
> >
> > + /** @nvm: discrete graphics non-volatile memory */
> > + struct intel_dg_nvm_dev *nvm;
> > +
> > /** @oa: oa observation subsystem */
> > struct xe_oa oa;
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_nvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_nvm.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..ce56bff1268b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_nvm.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright(c) 2019-2024, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/intel_dg_nvm_aux.h>
> > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> > +#include "xe_device_types.h"
> > +#include "xe_nvm.h"
> > +#include "xe_sriov.h"
> > +
> > +#define GEN12_GUNIT_NVM_BASE 0x00102040
> > +#define GEN12_GUNIT_NVM_SIZE 0x80
> > +#define HECI_FW_STATUS_2_NVM_ACCESS_MODE BIT(3)
> > +
> > +static const struct intel_dg_nvm_region regions[INTEL_DG_NVM_REGIONS] = {
> > + [0] = { .name = "DESCRIPTOR", },
> > + [2] = { .name = "GSC", },
> > + [11] = { .name = "OptionROM", },
> > + [12] = { .name = "DAM", },
>
> Could you please give some pointers to confirm this base and these regions?
>
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void xe_nvm_release_dev(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +void xe_nvm_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev);
> > + struct intel_dg_nvm_dev *nvm;
> > + struct auxiliary_device *aux_dev;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!HAS_GSC_NVM(xe))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /* No access to internal NVM from VFs */
> > + if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /* Nvm pointer should be NULL here */
> > + if (WARN_ON(xe->nvm))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + xe->nvm = kzalloc(sizeof(*nvm), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!xe->nvm)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + nvm = xe->nvm;
> > +
> > + nvm->writeable_override = false;
> > + nvm->bar.parent = &pdev->resource[0];
> > + nvm->bar.start = GEN12_GUNIT_NVM_BASE + pdev->resource[0].start;
> > + nvm->bar.end = nvm->bar.start + GEN12_GUNIT_NVM_SIZE - 1;
> > + nvm->bar.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> > + nvm->bar.desc = IORES_DESC_NONE;
> > + nvm->regions = regions;
> > +
> > + aux_dev = &nvm->aux_dev;
> > +
> > + aux_dev->name = "nvm";
> > + aux_dev->id = (pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus) << 16) |
> > + PCI_DEVID(pdev->bus->number, pdev->devfn);
> > + aux_dev->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> > + aux_dev->dev.release = xe_nvm_release_dev;
> > +
> > + ret = auxiliary_device_init(aux_dev);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "xe-nvm aux init failed %d\n", ret);
>
> Since these are inside the i915 and xe and you have our drm private device,
> I believe it would be better if we would use the drm_err and other drm debug
> variants here, below and also in the i915 patch.
Thanks for the confirmation of the offsets and regions.
With these dev_err changed towards the drm_err, feel free to use
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>
> Thank you so much,
> Rodrigo.
>
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = auxiliary_device_add(aux_dev);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "xe-nvm aux add failed %d\n", ret);
> > + auxiliary_device_uninit(aux_dev);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +void xe_nvm_fini(struct xe_device *xe)
> > +{
> > + struct intel_dg_nvm_dev *nvm = xe->nvm;
> > +
> > + if (!HAS_GSC_NVM(xe))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /* No access to internal NVM from VFs */
> > + if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /* Nvm pointer should not be NULL here */
> > + if (WARN_ON(!nvm))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + auxiliary_device_delete(&nvm->aux_dev);
> > + auxiliary_device_uninit(&nvm->aux_dev);
> > + kfree(nvm);
> > + xe->nvm = NULL;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_nvm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_nvm.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..068695447913
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_nvm.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright(c) 2019-2024 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef __XE_NVM_H__
> > +#define __XE_NVM_H__
> > +
> > +struct xe_device;
> > +
> > +void xe_nvm_init(struct xe_device *xe);
> > +
> > +void xe_nvm_fini(struct xe_device *xe);
> > +
> > +#endif /* __XE_NVM_H__ */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> > index 64a8336ca437..85c419eea710 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> > @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ struct xe_device_desc {
> > u8 has_display:1;
> > u8 has_heci_gscfi:1;
> > u8 has_heci_cscfi:1;
> > + u8 has_gsc_nvm:1;
> > u8 has_llc:1;
> > u8 has_mmio_ext:1;
> > u8 has_sriov:1;
> > @@ -282,6 +283,7 @@ static const struct xe_device_desc dg1_desc = {
> > PLATFORM(DG1),
> > .has_display = true,
> > .has_heci_gscfi = 1,
> > + .has_gsc_nvm = 1,
> > .require_force_probe = true,
> > };
> >
> > @@ -293,6 +295,7 @@ static const u16 dg2_g12_ids[] = { XE_DG2_G12_IDS(NOP), 0 };
> > DGFX_FEATURES, \
> > PLATFORM(DG2), \
> > .has_heci_gscfi = 1, \
> > + .has_gsc_nvm = 1, \
> > .subplatforms = (const struct xe_subplatform_desc[]) { \
> > { XE_SUBPLATFORM_DG2_G10, "G10", dg2_g10_ids }, \
> > { XE_SUBPLATFORM_DG2_G11, "G11", dg2_g11_ids }, \
> > @@ -324,6 +327,7 @@ static const __maybe_unused struct xe_device_desc pvc_desc = {
> > PLATFORM(PVC),
> > .has_display = false,
> > .has_heci_gscfi = 1,
> > + .has_gsc_nvm = 1,
> > .require_force_probe = true,
> > };
> >
> > @@ -623,6 +627,7 @@ static int xe_info_init_early(struct xe_device *xe,
> > xe->info.is_dgfx = desc->is_dgfx;
> > xe->info.has_heci_gscfi = desc->has_heci_gscfi;
> > xe->info.has_heci_cscfi = desc->has_heci_cscfi;
> > + xe->info.has_gsc_nvm = desc->has_gsc_nvm;
> > xe->info.has_llc = desc->has_llc;
> > xe->info.has_mmio_ext = desc->has_mmio_ext;
> > xe->info.has_sriov = desc->has_sriov;
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list