[PATCH v6 5/5] drm/amdgpu: track bo memory stats at runtime
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at igalia.com
Thu Nov 7 10:48:23 UTC 2024
On 31/10/2024 13:48, Li, Yunxiang (Teddy) wrote:
> [Public]
>
>> From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2024 8:54
>> Am 25.10.24 um 19:41 schrieb Yunxiang Li:
>>> Before, every time fdinfo is queried we try to lock all the BOs in the
>>> VM and calculate memory usage from scratch. This works okay if the
>>> fdinfo is rarely read and the VMs don't have a ton of BOs. If either
>>> of these conditions is not true, we get a massive performance hit.
>>>
>>> In this new revision, we track the BOs as they change states. This way
>>> when the fdinfo is queried we only need to take the status lock and
>>> copy out the usage stats with minimal impact to the runtime performance.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yunxiang Li <Yunxiang.Li at amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c | 14 +-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fdinfo.c | 10 +-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 107 +++--------
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h | 5 +-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 2 +-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 189 +++++++++++++++-----
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h | 12 +-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c | 1 +
>>> 8 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c
>>> index b144404902255..1d8a0ff3c8604 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c
>>> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>>> #include "amdgpu_gem.h"
>>> #include "amdgpu_dma_buf.h"
>>> #include "amdgpu_xgmi.h"
>>> +#include "amdgpu_vm.h"
>>> #include <drm/amdgpu_drm.h>
>>> #include <drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h>
>>> #include <linux/dma-buf.h>
>>> @@ -190,6 +191,13 @@ static void amdgpu_dma_buf_unmap(struct
>> dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void amdgpu_dma_buf_release(struct dma_buf *buf) {
>>> + struct amdgpu_bo *bo = gem_to_amdgpu_bo(buf->priv);
>>> + amdgpu_vm_bo_update_shared(bo, -1);
>>> + drm_gem_dmabuf_release(buf);
>>
>> Please run checkpatch.pl on the patch. As far as I can see it would complain about
>> the coding style here (empty line between declaration and code).
>>
>> Not much of an issue but we would like to prevent upstream from complaining about
>> such things.
>
> Will do
>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * amdgpu_dma_buf_begin_cpu_access - &dma_buf_ops.begin_cpu_access
>> implementation
>>> * @dma_buf: Shared DMA buffer
>>> @@ -237,7 +245,7 @@ const struct dma_buf_ops amdgpu_dmabuf_ops = {
>>> .unpin = amdgpu_dma_buf_unpin,
>>> .map_dma_buf = amdgpu_dma_buf_map,
>>> .unmap_dma_buf = amdgpu_dma_buf_unmap,
>>> - .release = drm_gem_dmabuf_release,
>>> + .release = amdgpu_dma_buf_release,
>>> .begin_cpu_access = amdgpu_dma_buf_begin_cpu_access,
>>> .mmap = drm_gem_dmabuf_mmap,
>>> .vmap = drm_gem_dmabuf_vmap,
>>> @@ -265,8 +273,10 @@ struct dma_buf *amdgpu_gem_prime_export(struct
>> drm_gem_object *gobj,
>>> return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
>>>
>>> buf = drm_gem_prime_export(gobj, flags);
>>> - if (!IS_ERR(buf))
>>> + if (!IS_ERR(buf)) {
>>> buf->ops = &amdgpu_dmabuf_ops;
>>> + amdgpu_vm_bo_update_shared(bo, +1);
>>> + }
>>>
>>> return buf;
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fdinfo.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fdinfo.c
>>> index 7a9573958d87c..e0e09f7b39d10 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fdinfo.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fdinfo.c
>>> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ void amdgpu_show_fdinfo(struct drm_printer *p, struct
>> drm_file *file)
>>> struct amdgpu_fpriv *fpriv = file->driver_priv;
>>> struct amdgpu_vm *vm = &fpriv->vm;
>>>
>>> - struct amdgpu_mem_stats stats[__AMDGPU_PL_LAST + 1] = { };
>>> + struct amdgpu_mem_stats stats[__AMDGPU_PL_LAST] = { };
>>> ktime_t usage[AMDGPU_HW_IP_NUM];
>>> const char *pl_name[] = {
>>> [TTM_PL_VRAM] = "vram",
>>> @@ -70,13 +70,7 @@ void amdgpu_show_fdinfo(struct drm_printer *p, struct
>> drm_file *file)
>>> unsigned int hw_ip, i;
>>> int ret;
>>>
>>> - ret = amdgpu_bo_reserve(vm->root.bo, false);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> - return;
>>> -
>>> - amdgpu_vm_get_memory(vm, stats, ARRAY_SIZE(stats));
>>> - amdgpu_bo_unreserve(vm->root.bo);
>>> -
>>> + amdgpu_vm_get_memory(vm, stats);
>>> amdgpu_ctx_mgr_usage(&fpriv->ctx_mgr, usage);
>>>
>>> /*
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
>>> index 2436b7c9ad12b..98563124ff99c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
>>> @@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ void amdgpu_bo_move_notify(struct ttm_buffer_object
>> *bo,
>>> return;
>>>
>>> abo = ttm_to_amdgpu_bo(bo);
>>> - amdgpu_vm_bo_invalidate(abo, evict);
>>> + amdgpu_vm_bo_move(abo, new_mem, evict);
>>>
>>> amdgpu_bo_kunmap(abo);
>>>
>>> @@ -1169,86 +1169,6 @@ void amdgpu_bo_move_notify(struct
>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>> old_mem ? old_mem->mem_type : -1);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -void amdgpu_bo_get_memory(struct amdgpu_bo *bo,
>>> - struct amdgpu_mem_stats *stats,
>>> - unsigned int sz)
>>> -{
>>> - const unsigned int domain_to_pl[] = {
>>> - [ilog2(AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU)] = TTM_PL_SYSTEM,
>>> - [ilog2(AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT)] = TTM_PL_TT,
>>> - [ilog2(AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM)] = TTM_PL_VRAM,
>>> - [ilog2(AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GDS)] =
>> AMDGPU_PL_GDS,
>>> - [ilog2(AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GWS)] =
>> AMDGPU_PL_GWS,
>>> - [ilog2(AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_OA)] = AMDGPU_PL_OA,
>>> - [ilog2(AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_DOORBELL)] =
>> AMDGPU_PL_DOORBELL,
>>> - };
>>> - struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(bo->tbo.bdev);
>>> - struct ttm_resource *res = bo->tbo.resource;
>>> - struct drm_gem_object *obj = &bo->tbo.base;
>>> - uint64_t size = amdgpu_bo_size(bo);
>>> - unsigned int type;
>>> -
>>> - if (!res) {
>>> - /*
>>> - * If no backing store use one of the preferred domain for basic
>>> - * stats. We take the MSB since that should give a reasonable
>>> - * view.
>>> - */
>>> - BUILD_BUG_ON(TTM_PL_VRAM < TTM_PL_TT ||
>>> - TTM_PL_VRAM < TTM_PL_SYSTEM);
>>> - type = fls(bo->preferred_domains &
>> AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_MASK);
>>> - if (!type)
>>> - return;
>>> - type--;
>>> - if (drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&adev->ddev,
>>> - type >= ARRAY_SIZE(domain_to_pl)))
>>> - return;
>>> - type = domain_to_pl[type];
>>> - } else {
>>> - type = res->mem_type;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - /* Squash some into 'cpu' to keep the legacy userspace view. */
>>> - switch (type) {
>>> - case TTM_PL_VRAM:
>>> - case TTM_PL_TT:
>>> - case TTM_PL_SYSTEM:
>>> - break;
>>> - default:
>>> - type = TTM_PL_SYSTEM;
>>> - break;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - if (drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&adev->ddev, type >= sz))
>>> - return;
>>> -
>>> - /* DRM stats common fields: */
>>> -
>>> - if (drm_gem_object_is_shared_for_memory_stats(obj))
>>> - stats[type].drm.shared += size;
>>> - else
>>> - stats[type].drm.private += size;
>>> -
>>> - if (res) {
>>> - stats[type].drm.resident += size;
>>> -
>>> - if (!dma_resv_test_signaled(obj->resv,
>> DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP))
>>> - stats[type].drm.active += size;
>>> - else if (bo->flags & AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_DISCARDABLE)
>>> - stats[type].drm.purgeable += size;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - /* amdgpu specific stats: */
>>> -
>>> - if (bo->preferred_domains & AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM) {
>>> - stats[TTM_PL_VRAM].requested += size;
>>> - if (type != TTM_PL_VRAM)
>>> - stats[TTM_PL_VRAM].evicted += size;
>>> - } else if (bo->preferred_domains & AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT) {
>>> - stats[TTM_PL_TT].requested += size;
>>> - }
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> /**
>>> * amdgpu_bo_release_notify - notification about a BO being released
>>> * @bo: pointer to a buffer object
>>> @@ -1463,6 +1383,31 @@ u64 amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset_no_check(struct
>> amdgpu_bo *bo)
>>> return amdgpu_gmc_sign_extend(offset);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +uint32_t amdgpu_bo_get_preferred_placement(struct amdgpu_bo *bo) {
>>> + uint32_t domain = bo->preferred_domains &
>> AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_MASK;
>>> + if (!domain)
>>> + return TTM_PL_SYSTEM;
>>> +
>>> + switch (ilog2(domain)) {
>>> + case AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU:
>>> + return TTM_PL_SYSTEM;
>>> + case AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT:
>>> + return TTM_PL_TT;
>>> + case AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM:
>>> + return TTM_PL_VRAM;
>>> + case AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GDS:
>>> + return AMDGPU_PL_GDS;
>>> + case AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GWS:
>>> + return AMDGPU_PL_GWS;
>>> + case AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_OA:
>>> + return AMDGPU_PL_OA;
>>> + case AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_DOORBELL:
>>> + return AMDGPU_PL_DOORBELL;
>>> + default:
>>> + return TTM_PL_SYSTEM;
>>
>> If I'm not completely mistaken that won't work like that.
>>
>> The AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_* defines are masks and not shifts.
>
> Yeah you are right, should have been rounddown_pow_of_two
>
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * amdgpu_bo_get_preferred_domain - get preferred domain
>>> * @adev: amdgpu device object
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
>>> index be6769852ece4..bd58a8b0ece66 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
>>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>>>
>>> #include <drm/amdgpu_drm.h>
>>> #include "amdgpu.h"
>>> +#include "amdgpu_ttm.h"
>>> #include "amdgpu_res_cursor.h"
>>
>> Why is that necessary?
>
> I got a compile error otherwise for those AMDGPU_PL_*
>
>>>
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
>>> @@ -300,9 +301,7 @@ int amdgpu_bo_sync_wait_resv(struct amdgpu_device
>> *adev, struct dma_resv *resv,
>>> int amdgpu_bo_sync_wait(struct amdgpu_bo *bo, void *owner, bool intr);
>>> u64 amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset(struct amdgpu_bo *bo);
>>> u64 amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset_no_check(struct amdgpu_bo *bo); -void
>>> amdgpu_bo_get_memory(struct amdgpu_bo *bo,
>>> - struct amdgpu_mem_stats *stats,
>>> - unsigned int size);
>>> +uint32_t amdgpu_bo_get_preferred_placement(struct amdgpu_bo *bo);
>>> uint32_t amdgpu_bo_get_preferred_domain(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>> uint32_t domain);
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
>>> index 2852a6064c9ac..a9088e864fde4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
>>> @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
>>>
>>> #include <linux/dma-direction.h>
>>> #include <drm/gpu_scheduler.h>
>>> +#include <drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h>
>>> #include "amdgpu_vram_mgr.h"
>>> -#include "amdgpu.h"
>>
>> Looks like a valuable cleanup, but should probably a separate patch.
>
> Without this there's a circular include that breaks compilation combined with the above
>
>>>
>>> #define AMDGPU_PL_GDS (TTM_PL_PRIV + 0)
>>> #define AMDGPU_PL_GWS (TTM_PL_PRIV + 1)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>>> index 9fab64edd0530..abd35c18ddaa8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>>> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>>> #include <drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h>
>>> #include <drm/drm_exec.h>
>>> #include "amdgpu.h"
>>> +#include "amdgpu_vm.h"
>>> #include "amdgpu_trace.h"
>>> #include "amdgpu_amdkfd.h"
>>> #include "amdgpu_gmc.h"
>>> @@ -310,6 +311,94 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_bo_reset_state_machine(struct
>> amdgpu_vm *vm)
>>> spin_unlock(&vm->status_lock);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * amdgpu_vm_update_shared - helper to update shared memory stat
>>> + * @base: base structure for tracking BO usage in a VM
>>> + * @sign: if we should add (+1) or subtract (-1) from the shared stat
>>> + *
>>> + * Takes the vm status_lock and updates the shared memory stat. If
>>> +the basic
>>> + * stat changed (e.g. buffer was moved) amdgpu_vm_update_stats need
>>> +to be called
>>> + * as well.
>>> + */
>>> +static void amdgpu_vm_update_shared(struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *base,
>>> +int sign) {
>>> + struct amdgpu_vm *vm = base->vm;
>>> + struct amdgpu_bo *bo = base->bo;
>>> + struct ttm_resource *res;
>>> + int64_t size;
>>> + uint32_t type;
>>> +
>>> + if (!vm || !bo)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + size = sign * amdgpu_bo_size(bo);
>>> + if ((res = bo->tbo.resource))
>>> + type = res->mem_type;
>>> + else
>>> + type = amdgpu_bo_get_preferred_placement(bo);
>>
>> As discussed with Tvrtko that won't work like this.
>>
>> Either use the preferred placement or the actual backing store, but don't use a
>> fallback here.
>
> I had a follow up discussion with Tvrtko here https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/2024-October/116024.html it seems like this is the intended semantics for the drm-total-* stats. I can see it going both ways, I guess it's just up to which design is most useful for whom ever is reading the stats.
>
Yeah I think this is correct, unless the allowed mask would perhaps be
better than preferred. We don't want drm-total- to show zero if object
simply has no current placement.
> Current design is for it to mean "all the buffer currently at X" + "all the buffer that wants to be at X but currently don't have a backing"
> The alternative I guess is for it to mean "all the buffer that wants to be at X"
Alternative is the same, no? But I think it is correct. As I explained
before drm-total should be akin to VIRT in top(1) and drm-resident to RES.
> Btw, I'm having trouble figuring out where I should account for drm-active-* it's for buffers that are currently being used (e.g. have a fence not signaled) it seems like the work scheduling part is quite far removed from the individual BOs...
Ah that is a fun one. Perhaps we should add DRM_GEM_OBJECT_ACTIVE and
use it from drm_print_memory_stats() as with resident and purgeable.
Then amdgpu could opt to not display those and it probably wouldn't be a
huge loss since drm-active- is very transient and low value.
Regards,
Tvrtko
>
>>> + if (type >= __AMDGPU_PL_LAST)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + spin_lock(&vm->status_lock);
>>> + vm->stats[type].drm.shared += size;
>>> + vm->stats[type].drm.private -= size;
>>> + spin_unlock(&vm->status_lock);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * amdgpu_vm_update_stats - helper to update normal memory stat
>>> + * @base: base structure for tracking BO usage in a VM
>>> + * @new_res: if not NULL, the ttm_resource to use for the purpose of
>>> +accounting
>>> + * (i.e. ignore the one in the BO)
>>> + * @sign: if we should add (+1) or subtract (-1) from the stat
>>> + *
>>> + * Takes the vm status_lock and updates the basic memory stat. If the
>>> +shared
>>> + * stat changed (e.g. buffer was exported) amdgpu_vm_update_shared
>>> +need to be
>>> + * called as well.
>>> + */
>>> +void amdgpu_vm_update_stats(struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *base,
>>> + struct ttm_resource *new_res, int sign) {
>>> + struct amdgpu_vm *vm = base->vm;
>>> + struct amdgpu_bo *bo = base->bo;
>>> + struct ttm_resource *res;
>>> + int64_t size;
>>> + uint32_t type;
>>> + bool shared;
>>> +
>>> + if (!vm || !bo)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + size = sign * amdgpu_bo_size(bo);
>>> + res = new_res ? new_res : bo->tbo.resource;
>>> + type = res ? res->mem_type : amdgpu_bo_get_preferred_placement(bo);
>>
>> Same here. Don't use the preferred domain as fallback.
>>
>>> + shared = drm_gem_object_is_shared_for_memory_stats(&bo->tbo.base);
>>> +
>>> + if (type >= __AMDGPU_PL_LAST)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + spin_lock(&vm->status_lock);
>>> +
>>> + if (shared)
>>> + vm->stats[type].drm.shared += size;
>>> + else
>>> + vm->stats[type].drm.private += size;
>>> + if (res)
>>> + vm->stats[type].drm.resident += size;
>>> + if (bo->flags & AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_DISCARDABLE)
>>> + vm->stats[type].drm.purgeable += size;
>>> +
>>> + if (bo->preferred_domains & AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM) {
>>> + vm->stats[TTM_PL_VRAM].requested += size;
>>> + if (type != TTM_PL_VRAM)
>>> + vm->stats[TTM_PL_VRAM].evicted += size;
>>
>> That check is probably not correct. We have BOs which can be placed in both
>> VRAM and GTT.
>
> That is true, but does it make sense to count it towards evicted if say our picking order prefers VRAM over GTT?
>
>>> + } else if (bo->preferred_domains & AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT) {
>>> + vm->stats[TTM_PL_TT].requested += size;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + spin_unlock(&vm->status_lock);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * amdgpu_vm_bo_base_init - Adds bo to the list of bos associated with the vm
>>> *
>>> @@ -332,6 +421,7 @@ void amdgpu_vm_bo_base_init(struct
>> amdgpu_vm_bo_base *base,
>>> return;
>>> base->next = bo->vm_bo;
>>> bo->vm_bo = base;
>>> + amdgpu_vm_update_stats(base, NULL, +1);
>>>
>>> if (!amdgpu_vm_is_bo_always_valid(vm, bo))
>>> return;
>>> @@ -1082,53 +1172,11 @@ int amdgpu_vm_update_range(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>>> return r;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static void amdgpu_vm_bo_get_memory(struct amdgpu_bo_va *bo_va,
>>> - struct amdgpu_mem_stats *stats,
>>> - unsigned int size)
>>> -{
>>> - struct amdgpu_vm *vm = bo_va->base.vm;
>>> - struct amdgpu_bo *bo = bo_va->base.bo;
>>> -
>>> - if (!bo)
>>> - return;
>>> -
>>> - /*
>>> - * For now ignore BOs which are currently locked and potentially
>>> - * changing their location.
>>> - */
>>> - if (!amdgpu_vm_is_bo_always_valid(vm, bo) &&
>>> - !dma_resv_trylock(bo->tbo.base.resv))
>>> - return;
>>> -
>>> - amdgpu_bo_get_memory(bo, stats, size);
>>> - if (!amdgpu_vm_is_bo_always_valid(vm, bo))
>>> - dma_resv_unlock(bo->tbo.base.resv);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> void amdgpu_vm_get_memory(struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>>> - struct amdgpu_mem_stats *stats,
>>> - unsigned int size)
>>> + struct amdgpu_mem_stats stats[__AMDGPU_PL_LAST])
>>> {
>>> - struct amdgpu_bo_va *bo_va, *tmp;
>>> -
>>> spin_lock(&vm->status_lock);
>>> - list_for_each_entry_safe(bo_va, tmp, &vm->idle, base.vm_status)
>>> - amdgpu_vm_bo_get_memory(bo_va, stats, size);
>>> -
>>> - list_for_each_entry_safe(bo_va, tmp, &vm->evicted, base.vm_status)
>>> - amdgpu_vm_bo_get_memory(bo_va, stats, size);
>>> -
>>> - list_for_each_entry_safe(bo_va, tmp, &vm->relocated, base.vm_status)
>>> - amdgpu_vm_bo_get_memory(bo_va, stats, size);
>>> -
>>> - list_for_each_entry_safe(bo_va, tmp, &vm->moved, base.vm_status)
>>> - amdgpu_vm_bo_get_memory(bo_va, stats, size);
>>> -
>>> - list_for_each_entry_safe(bo_va, tmp, &vm->invalidated, base.vm_status)
>>> - amdgpu_vm_bo_get_memory(bo_va, stats, size);
>>> -
>>> - list_for_each_entry_safe(bo_va, tmp, &vm->done, base.vm_status)
>>> - amdgpu_vm_bo_get_memory(bo_va, stats, size);
>>> + memcpy(stats, vm->stats, sizeof(*stats) * __AMDGPU_PL_LAST);
>>> spin_unlock(&vm->status_lock);
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -2071,6 +2119,7 @@ void amdgpu_vm_bo_del(struct amdgpu_device
>> *adev,
>>> if (*base != &bo_va->base)
>>> continue;
>>>
>>> + amdgpu_vm_update_stats(*base, NULL, -1);
>>> *base = bo_va->base.next;
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> @@ -2136,6 +2185,22 @@ bool amdgpu_vm_evictable(struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
>>> return true;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * amdgpu_vm_bo_update_shared - called when bo gets shared/unshared
>>> + *
>>> + * @bo: amdgpu buffer object
>>> + * @sign: if we should add (+1) or subtract (-1) the memory stat
>>> + *
>>> + * Update the per VM stats for all the vm */ void
>>> +amdgpu_vm_bo_update_shared(struct amdgpu_bo *bo, int sign) {
>>> + struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *bo_base;
>>> +
>>> + for (bo_base = bo->vm_bo; bo_base; bo_base = bo_base->next)
>>> + amdgpu_vm_update_shared(bo_base, sign); }
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * amdgpu_vm_bo_invalidate - mark the bo as invalid
>>> *
>>> @@ -2169,6 +2234,28 @@ void amdgpu_vm_bo_invalidate(struct amdgpu_bo
>> *bo, bool evicted)
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * amdgpu_vm_bo_move - handle BO move
>>> + *
>>> + * @bo: amdgpu buffer object
>>> + * @new_mem: the new placement of the BO move
>>> + * @evicted: is the BO evicted
>>> + *
>>> + * Update the memory stats for the new placement and mark @bo as invalid.
>>> + */
>>> +void amdgpu_vm_bo_move(struct amdgpu_bo *bo, struct ttm_resource
>> *new_mem,
>>> + bool evicted)
>>> +{
>>> + struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *bo_base;
>>> +
>>> + for (bo_base = bo->vm_bo; bo_base; bo_base = bo_base->next) {
>>> + amdgpu_vm_update_stats(bo_base, bo->tbo.resource, -1);
>>> + amdgpu_vm_update_stats(bo_base, new_mem, +1);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + amdgpu_vm_bo_invalidate(bo, evicted); }
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * amdgpu_vm_get_block_size - calculate VM page table size as power of two
>>> *
>>> @@ -2585,6 +2672,18 @@ void amdgpu_vm_release_compute(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm)
>>> vm->is_compute_context = false;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int amdgpu_vm_stats_is_zero(struct amdgpu_vm *vm) {
>>> + int is_zero = 1;
>>> + for (int i = 0; i < __AMDGPU_PL_LAST; ++i) {
>>> + is_zero = drm_memory_stats_is_zero(&vm->stats[i].drm) &&
>>> + vm->stats->evicted == 0 && vm->stats->requested == 0;
>>> + if (!is_zero)
>>> + break;
>>
>> Just make that an "if (...) return false", no need for the local variable.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>
> D'oh!
>
> Teddy
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list