[RFC PATCH 2/6] drm/sched: Teach scheduler about DMA_RESV_USAGE_PREEMPT
Philipp Stanner
pstanner at redhat.com
Tue Nov 12 09:06:21 UTC 2024
Hi Matt,
On Sat, 2024-11-09 at 09:29 -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Follow the semantics of DMA_RESV_USAGE_PREEMPT in the DRM scheduler
> by
> storing preemptive fences in a dedicated xarray, which is waited on
> after all other fences are signaled. In addition to following these
> semantics, pipeline preemptive fences by enabling signaling on all
> preemptive fences before waiting on any of them.
the commit message lacks the *motivation*. Why is the current state a
problem, why is that feature needed etc.
>
> Cc: Philipp Stanner <pstanner at redhat.com>
> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr at kernel.org>
> Cc: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov89 at gmail.com>
> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
> Cc: Simona Vetter <simona.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Christian Koenig <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 29 ++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++------
> --
> include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 15 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> index 69bcf0e99d57..c6c4978aa65a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> @@ -201,11 +201,13 @@ static void
> drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb(struct dma_fence *f,
> struct drm_sched_job *job = container_of(cb, struct
> drm_sched_job,
> finish_cb);
> unsigned long index;
> + struct xarray *dependencies = &job->dependencies;
>
> dma_fence_put(f);
>
> +again:
> /* Wait for all dependencies to avoid data corruptions */
> - xa_for_each(&job->dependencies, index, f) {
> + xa_for_each(dependencies, index, f) {
> struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence =
> to_drm_sched_fence(f);
>
> if (s_fence && f == &s_fence->scheduled) {
> @@ -223,7 +225,7 @@ static void drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb(struct
> dma_fence *f,
> dma_fence_put(&s_fence->scheduled);
> }
>
> - xa_erase(&job->dependencies, index);
> + xa_erase(dependencies, index);
> if (f && !dma_fence_add_callback(f, &job->finish_cb,
>
> drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb))
> return;
> @@ -231,6 +233,11 @@ static void drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb(struct
> dma_fence *f,
> dma_fence_put(f);
> }
>
> + if (dependencies != &job->preempt_dependencies) {
> + dependencies = &job->preempt_dependencies;
> + goto again;
> + }
> +
I think this should have a comment. It can only trigger once, right? So
I guess that's why it doesn't make sense considering making it a loop
instead of goto upwards?
> INIT_WORK(&job->work, drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_work);
> schedule_work(&job->work);
> }
> @@ -456,17 +463,33 @@ drm_sched_job_dependency(struct drm_sched_job
> *job,
> struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
> {
> struct dma_fence *f;
> + struct xarray *dependencies;
> +
> +again:
> + dependencies = job->resolve_preempt_dependencies ?
> + &job->preempt_dependencies : &job->dependencies;
I don't think it's good to use the ternary operator for such long
statements.
if-else is more readable.
>
> /* We keep the fence around, so we can iterate over all
> dependencies
> * in drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb() to ensure all deps are
> signaled
> * before killing the job.
> */
> - f = xa_load(&job->dependencies, job->last_dependency);
> + f = xa_load(dependencies, job->last_dependency);
> if (f) {
> job->last_dependency++;
> return dma_fence_get(f);
> }
>
> + /* Switch resolving preempt dependencies pipelining
> signaling */
I don't understand this comment. I guess you want to say that this section resolves preemption dependencies for the (fence) pipeline signaling?
> + if (!job->resolve_preempt_dependencies) {
> + unsigned long index;
> +
> + xa_for_each(&job->preempt_dependencies, index, f)
> + dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(f);
> +
> + job->resolve_preempt_dependencies = true;
Hm, is this set to false ever again? It seems it doesn't need to? So
the goto again is only ever triggered once?
> + goto again;
> + }
> +
> if (job->sched->ops->prepare_job)
> return job->sched->ops->prepare_job(job, entity);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> index 7ce25281c74c..eceb9b8c6f5f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> @@ -829,6 +829,7 @@ int drm_sched_job_init(struct drm_sched_job *job,
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&job->list);
>
> xa_init_flags(&job->dependencies, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
> + xa_init_flags(&job->preempt_dependencies, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -864,21 +865,14 @@ void drm_sched_job_arm(struct drm_sched_job
> *job)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_arm);
>
> -/**
> - * drm_sched_job_add_dependency - adds the fence as a job dependency
> - * @job: scheduler job to add the dependencies to
> - * @fence: the dma_fence to add to the list of dependencies.
> - *
> - * Note that @fence is consumed in both the success and error cases.
> - *
> - * Returns:
> - * 0 on success, or an error on failing to expand the array.
> - */
> -int drm_sched_job_add_dependency(struct drm_sched_job *job,
> - struct dma_fence *fence)
> +static int __drm_sched_job_add_dependency(struct drm_sched_job *job,
> + struct dma_fence *fence,
> + bool is_preempt)
> {
> struct dma_fence *entry;
> unsigned long index;
> + struct xarray *dependencies = is_preempt ? &job-
> >preempt_dependencies :
> + &job->dependencies;
Same – is better as an if-else below
> u32 id = 0;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -889,25 +883,41 @@ int drm_sched_job_add_dependency(struct
> drm_sched_job *job,
> * This lets the size of the array of deps scale with the
> number of
> * engines involved, rather than the number of BOs.
> */
> - xa_for_each(&job->dependencies, index, entry) {
> + xa_for_each(dependencies, index, entry) {
> if (entry->context != fence->context)
> continue;
>
> if (dma_fence_is_later(fence, entry)) {
> dma_fence_put(entry);
> - xa_store(&job->dependencies, index, fence,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> + xa_store(dependencies, index, fence,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> } else {
> dma_fence_put(fence);
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> - ret = xa_alloc(&job->dependencies, &id, fence, xa_limit_32b,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> + ret = xa_alloc(dependencies, &id, fence, xa_limit_32b,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (ret != 0)
> dma_fence_put(fence);
>
> return ret;
> }
> +
> +/**
> + * drm_sched_job_add_dependency - adds the fence as a job dependency
> + * @job: scheduler job to add the dependencies to
> + * @fence: the dma_fence to add to the list of dependencies.
> + *
> + * Note that @fence is consumed in both the success and error cases.
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + * 0 on success, or an error on failing to expand the array.
> + */
> +int drm_sched_job_add_dependency(struct drm_sched_job *job,
> + struct dma_fence *fence)
> +{
> + return __drm_sched_job_add_dependency(job, fence, false);
> +}
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_add_dependency);
>
> /**
> @@ -963,7 +973,9 @@ int drm_sched_job_add_resv_dependencies(struct
> drm_sched_job *job,
> dma_resv_for_each_fence(&cursor, resv, usage, fence) {
> /* Make sure to grab an additional ref on the added
> fence */
> dma_fence_get(fence);
> - ret = drm_sched_job_add_dependency(job, fence);
> + ret = __drm_sched_job_add_dependency(job, fence,
> +
> cursor.fence_usage ==
> +
> DMA_RESV_USAGE_PREEMPT);
> if (ret) {
> dma_fence_put(fence);
> return ret;
> @@ -1030,6 +1042,10 @@ void drm_sched_job_cleanup(struct
> drm_sched_job *job)
> }
> xa_destroy(&job->dependencies);
>
> + xa_for_each(&job->preempt_dependencies, index, fence) {
> + dma_fence_put(fence);
> + }
> + xa_destroy(&job->preempt_dependencies);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_cleanup);
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> index 95e17504e46a..de16cf6b1869 100644
> --- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> +++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> @@ -353,6 +353,13 @@ struct drm_sched_job {
>
> u32 credits;
>
> + /**
> + * @resolve_preempt_dependencies:
> + *
> + * Job is currently resolving preempt dependencies.
> + */
> + bool resolve_preempt_dependencies
> ;
I think this should be called "resolving_preempt_dependencies". Just 2
letters more and it emphasizes that this is happening "currently".
P.
> +
> /*
> * work is used only after finish_cb has been used and will
> not be
> * accessed anymore.
> @@ -376,6 +383,14 @@ struct drm_sched_job {
> */
> struct xarray dependencies;
>
> + /**
> + * @preempt_dependencies:
> + *
> + * Contains the dependencies as struct dma_fence for this
> job which are
> + * preempt fences.
> + */
> + struct xarray preempt_dependencies;
> +
> /** @last_dependency: tracks @dependencies as they signal */
> unsigned long last_dependency;
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list