[PATCH 2/5] drm/panthor: Be robust against runtime PM resume failures in the suspend path
Liviu Dudau
liviu.dudau at arm.com
Thu Nov 14 11:36:28 UTC 2024
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 12:27:55PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 11:13:29 +0000
> Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau at arm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 04:42:54PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > The runtime PM resume operation is not guaranteed to succeed, but if it
> > > fails, the device should be in a suspended state. Make sure we're robust
> > > to resume failures in the unplug path.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at collabora.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.c | 23 ++++++++---------------
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gpu.c | 3 ++-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c | 3 ++-
> > > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.c
> > > index db7ba40f771d..8b5d54b2bbb4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.c
> > > @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ static int panthor_clk_init(struct panthor_device *ptdev)
> > >
> > > void panthor_device_unplug(struct panthor_device *ptdev)
> > > {
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > /* This function can be called from two different path: the reset work
> > > * and the platform device remove callback. drm_dev_unplug() doesn't
> > > * deal with concurrent callers, so we have to protect drm_dev_unplug()
> > > @@ -74,7 +76,8 @@ void panthor_device_unplug(struct panthor_device *ptdev)
> > > */
> > > mutex_unlock(&ptdev->unplug.lock);
> > >
> > > - drm_WARN_ON(&ptdev->base, pm_runtime_get_sync(ptdev->base.dev) < 0);
> > > + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(ptdev->base.dev);
> > > + drm_WARN_ON(&ptdev->base, ret < 0);
> > >
> > > /* Now, try to cleanly shutdown the GPU before the device resources
> > > * get reclaimed.
> > > @@ -85,7 +88,10 @@ void panthor_device_unplug(struct panthor_device *ptdev)
> > > panthor_gpu_unplug(ptdev);
> > >
> > > pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(ptdev->base.dev);
> > > - pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(ptdev->base.dev);
> > > +
> > > + /* If the resume failed, we don't need to suspend here. */
> > > + if (!ret)
> > > + pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(ptdev->base.dev);
> > >
> > > /* If PM is disabled, we need to call the suspend handler manually. */
> > > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM))
> > > @@ -541,17 +547,4 @@ int panthor_device_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > > clk_disable_unprepare(ptdev->clks.core);
> > > atomic_set(&ptdev->pm.state, PANTHOR_DEVICE_PM_STATE_SUSPENDED);
> > > return 0;
> > > -
> > > -err_set_active:
> >
> > Label is being deleted here, but I don't see where the `goto err_set_active` is being removed.
>
> Yes, as mentioned in my own reply, this chunk should be in patch 3.
Sorry, I did look at patch 3 before sending the email but somehow missed the line with the goto being deleted.
With the change:
Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau at arm.com>
Best regards,
Liviu
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list