[PATCH v6 4/7] drm/sched: cleanup gpu_scheduler trace events
Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer
pierre-eric at damsy.net
Thu Nov 21 15:30:29 UTC 2024
Le 14/11/2024 à 12:50, Tvrtko Ursulin a écrit :
>
> On 14/11/2024 10:01, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
>> A fence uniquely identify a job, so this commits updates the places
>> where a kernel pointer was used as an identifier by:
>>
>> "fence=(context:%llu, seqno:%lld)"
>
> Any special reason for %lld? Planning to use like -1 for unknown or something?
>
Indeed, %llu is better.
> Btw in i915 we use fence=%llu:%llu which is more compact and IMO still readable so perhaps something
> to consider.
I'll switch to "fence=%llu:%llu" unless others have concerns.
Thanks,
Pierre-Eric
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer at amd.com>
>> ---
>> .../gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler_trace.h | 39 +++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/
>> gpu_scheduler_trace.h
>> index c4ec28540656..24358c4d5bbe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler_trace.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler_trace.h
>> @@ -36,28 +36,29 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(drm_sched_job,
>> TP_PROTO(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job, struct drm_sched_entity *entity),
>> TP_ARGS(sched_job, entity),
>> TP_STRUCT__entry(
>> - __field(struct drm_sched_entity *, entity)
>> - __field(struct dma_fence *, fence)
>> __string(name, sched_job->sched->name)
>> __field(uint64_t, id)
>> __field(u32, job_count)
>> __field(int, hw_job_count)
>> __string(dev, dev_name(sched_job->sched->dev))
>> + __field(uint64_t, fence_context)
>> + __field(uint64_t, fence_seqno)
>> ),
>> TP_fast_assign(
>> - __entry->entity = entity;
>> __entry->id = sched_job->id;
>> - __entry->fence = &sched_job->s_fence->finished;
>> __assign_str(name);
>> __entry->job_count = spsc_queue_count(&entity->job_queue);
>> __entry->hw_job_count = atomic_read(
>> &sched_job->sched->credit_count);
>> __assign_str(dev);
>> + __entry->fence_context = sched_job->s_fence->finished.context;
>> + __entry->fence_seqno = sched_job->s_fence->finished.seqno;
>> +
>> ),
>> - TP_printk("dev=%s, entity=%p, id=%llu, fence=%p, ring=%s, job count:%u, hw job count:%d",
>> - __get_str(dev), __entry->entity, __entry->id,
>> - __entry->fence, __get_str(name),
>> + TP_printk("dev=%s, id=%llu, fence=(context:%llu, seqno:%lld), ring=%s, job count:%u, hw
>> job count:%d",
>> + __get_str(dev), __entry->id,
>> + __entry->fence_context, __entry->fence_seqno, __get_str(name),
>> __entry->job_count, __entry->hw_job_count)
>> );
>> @@ -75,37 +76,41 @@ TRACE_EVENT(drm_sched_process_job,
>> TP_PROTO(struct drm_sched_fence *fence),
>> TP_ARGS(fence),
>> TP_STRUCT__entry(
>> - __field(struct dma_fence *, fence)
>> + __field(uint64_t, fence_context)
>> + __field(uint64_t, fence_seqno)
>> ),
>> TP_fast_assign(
>> - __entry->fence = &fence->finished;
>> + __entry->fence_context = fence->finished.context;
>> + __entry->fence_seqno = fence->finished.seqno;
>> ),
>> - TP_printk("fence=%p signaled", __entry->fence)
>> + TP_printk("fence=(context:%llu, seqno:%lld) signaled",
>> + __entry->fence_context, __entry->fence_seqno)
>> );
>> TRACE_EVENT(drm_sched_job_wait_dep,
>> TP_PROTO(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job, struct dma_fence *fence),
>> TP_ARGS(sched_job, fence),
>> TP_STRUCT__entry(
>> - __string(name, sched_job->sched->name)
>> + __field(uint64_t, fence_context)
>> + __field(uint64_t, fence_seqno)
>> __field(uint64_t, id)
>> __field(struct dma_fence *, fence)
>> __field(uint64_t, ctx)
>> - __field(unsigned, seqno)
>> + __field(uint64_t, seqno)
>> ),
>> TP_fast_assign(
>> - __assign_str(name);
>> + __entry->fence_context = sched_job->s_fence->finished.context;
>> + __entry->fence_seqno = sched_job->s_fence->finished.seqno;
>> __entry->id = sched_job->id;
>> __entry->fence = fence;
>> __entry->ctx = fence->context;
>> __entry->seqno = fence->seqno;
>> ),
>> - TP_printk("job ring=%s, id=%llu, depends fence=%p, context=%llu, seq=%u",
>> - __get_str(name), __entry->id,
>> - __entry->fence, __entry->ctx,
>> - __entry->seqno)
>> + TP_printk("fence=(context:%llu, seqno:%lld), id=%llu, dependencies:{(context:%llu, seqno:
>> %lld)}",
>> + __entry->fence_context, __entry->fence_seqno, __entry->id,
>> + __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno)
>> );
>> #endif
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list