[PATCH 1/7] drm/tidss: Fix issue in irq handling causing irq-flood issue
Aradhya Bhatia
aradhya.bhatia at linux.dev
Sun Nov 24 17:18:35 UTC 2024
Hi Tomi, Devarsh,
On 10/21/24 19:37, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> It has been observed that sometimes DSS will trigger an interrupt and
> the top level interrupt (DISPC_IRQSTATUS) is not zero, but the VP and
> VID level interrupt-statuses are zero.
Does this mean that there was a legitimate interrupt that potentially
went unrecognized? Or that there was a, for the lack of a better word,
fake interrupt trigger that doesn't need handling but just clearing?
>
> As the top level irqstatus is supposed to tell whether we have VP/VID
> interrupts, the thinking of the driver authors was that this particular
> case could never happen. Thus the driver only clears the DISPC_IRQSTATUS
> bits which has corresponding interrupts in VP/VID status. So when this
> issue happens, the driver will not clear DISPC_IRQSTATUS, and we get an
> interrupt flood.
>
> It is unclear why the issue happens. It could be a race issue in the
> driver, but no such race has been found. It could also be an issue with
> the HW. However a similar case can be easily triggered by manually
> writing to DISPC_IRQSTATUS_RAW. This will forcibly set a bit in the
> DISPC_IRQSTATUS and trigger an interrupt, and as the driver never clears
> the bit, we get an interrupt flood.
>
> To fix the issue, always clear DISPC_IRQSTATUS. The concern with this
> solution is that if the top level irqstatus is the one that triggers the
> interrupt, always clearing DISPC_IRQSTATUS might leave some interrupts
> unhandled if VP/VID interrupt statuses have bits set. However, testing
> shows that if any of the irqstatuses is set (i.e. even if
> DISPC_IRQSTATUS == 0, but a VID irqstatus has a bit set), we will get an
> interrupt.
Does this mean if VID/VP irqstatus has been set right around the time
the equivalent DISPC_IRQSTATUS bit is being cleared, the equivalent
DISPC_IRQSTATUS bit is going to get set again, and make the driver
handle the event as we expect it to?
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen at ideasonboard.com>
> Co-developed-by: Bin Liu <b-liu at ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bin Liu <b-liu at ti.com>
> Co-developed-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht at ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht at ti.com>
> Co-developed-by: Jonathan Cormier <jcormier at criticallink.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cormier <jcormier at criticallink.com>
> Fixes: 32a1795f57ee ("drm/tidss: New driver for TI Keystone platform Display SubSystem")
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c | 12 ++++--------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c
> index 1ad711f8d2a8..f81111067578 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c
> @@ -780,24 +780,20 @@ static
> void dispc_k3_clear_irqstatus(struct dispc_device *dispc, dispc_irq_t clearmask)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> - u32 top_clear = 0;
>
> for (i = 0; i < dispc->feat->num_vps; ++i) {
> - if (clearmask & DSS_IRQ_VP_MASK(i)) {
> + if (clearmask & DSS_IRQ_VP_MASK(i))
> dispc_k3_vp_write_irqstatus(dispc, i, clearmask);
> - top_clear |= BIT(i);
> - }
> }
> for (i = 0; i < dispc->feat->num_planes; ++i) {
> - if (clearmask & DSS_IRQ_PLANE_MASK(i)) {
> + if (clearmask & DSS_IRQ_PLANE_MASK(i))
> dispc_k3_vid_write_irqstatus(dispc, i, clearmask);
> - top_clear |= BIT(4 + i);
> - }
> }
nit: Maybe these for-loop braces could be dropped as well.
Otherwise, LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia at linux.dev>
Regards
Aradhya
[..]
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list