[WIP RFC v2 01/35] WIP: rust/drm: Add fourcc bindings

Daniel Almeida daniel.almeida at collabora.com
Tue Nov 26 17:40:54 UTC 2024


Hi Lyude, sorry for the late review!

> On 30 Sep 2024, at 20:09, Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> This adds some very basic rust bindings for fourcc. We only have a single
> format code added for the moment, but this is enough to get a driver
> registered.
> 
> TODO:
> * Write up something to automatically generate constants from the fourcc
>  headers

I assume this is blocked on [0], right?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
> ---
> rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h |   1 +
> rust/kernel/drm/fourcc.rs       | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> rust/kernel/drm/mod.rs          |   1 +
> 3 files changed, 129 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 rust/kernel/drm/fourcc.rs
> 
> diff --git a/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h b/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> index b2e05f8c2ee7d..04898f70ef1b8 100644
> --- a/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> +++ b/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include <drm/drm_device.h>
> #include <drm/drm_drv.h>
> #include <drm/drm_file.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_fourcc.h>
> #include <drm/drm_gem.h>
> #include <drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.h>
> #include <drm/drm_ioctl.h>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/drm/fourcc.rs b/rust/kernel/drm/fourcc.rs
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..b80eba99aa7e4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/rust/kernel/drm/fourcc.rs
> @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
> +use bindings;
> +use core::{ops::*, slice, ptr};
> +
> +const fn fourcc_code(a: u8, b: u8, c: u8, d: u8) -> u32 {
> +    (a as u32) | (b as u32) << 8 | (c as u32) << 16 | (d as u32) << 24
> +}
> +
> +// TODO: Figure out a more automated way of importing this
> +pub const XRGB888: u32 = fourcc_code(b'X', b'R', b'2', b'4');
> +
> +#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
> +#[repr(C)]
> +pub struct FormatList<const COUNT: usize> {
> +    list: [u32; COUNT],
> +    _sentinel: u32,
> +}
> +
> +impl<const COUNT: usize> FormatList<COUNT> {
> +    /// Create a new [`FormatList`]
> +    pub const fn new(list: [u32; COUNT]) -> Self {
> +        Self {
> +            list,
> +            _sentinel: 0
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    /// Returns the number of entries in the list, including the sentinel.
> +    ///
> +    /// This is generally only useful for passing [`FormatList`] to C bindings.
> +    pub const fn raw_len(&self) -> usize {
> +        COUNT + 1
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +impl<const COUNT: usize> Deref for FormatList<COUNT> {
> +    type Target = [u32; COUNT];
> +
> +    fn deref(&self) -> &Self::Target {
> +        &self.list
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +impl<const COUNT: usize> DerefMut for FormatList<COUNT> {
> +    fn deref_mut(&mut self) -> &mut Self::Target {
> +        &mut self.list
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
> +#[repr(C)]
> +pub struct ModifierList<const COUNT: usize> {
> +    list: [u64; COUNT],
> +    _sentinel: u64
> +}
> +
> +impl<const COUNT: usize> ModifierList<COUNT> {
> +    /// Create a new [`ModifierList`]
> +    pub const fn new(list: [u64; COUNT]) -> Self {
> +        Self {
> +            list,
> +            _sentinel: 0
> +        }
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +impl<const COUNT: usize> Deref for ModifierList<COUNT> {
> +    type Target = [u64; COUNT];
> +
> +    fn deref(&self) -> &Self::Target {
> +        &self.list
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +impl<const COUNT: usize> DerefMut for ModifierList<COUNT> {
> +    fn deref_mut(&mut self) -> &mut Self::Target {
> +        &mut self.list
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +#[repr(transparent)]
> +#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
> +pub struct FormatInfo {
> +    inner: bindings::drm_format_info,
> +}
> +
> +impl FormatInfo {
> +    // SAFETY: `ptr` must point to a valid instance of a `bindings::drm_format_info`
> +    pub(super) unsafe fn from_raw<'a>(ptr: *const bindings::drm_format_info) -> &'a Self {

I think FormatInfoRef would be more appropriate, since you seem to be creating a reference type (IIUC)
for a type that can also be owned.

This would be more in line with the GEM [1] patch, for example.

In other words, using `Ref` here will allow for both an owned `FormatInfo` and a `FormatInfoRef<‘_>`.

I am not sure about the role of lifetime ‘a here. If you wanted to tie the lifetime of &Self to that of the pointer,
this does not do it, specially considering that pointers do not have lifetimes associated with them.

> +        // SAFETY: Our data layout is identical
> +        unsafe { &*ptr.cast() }

It’s hard to know what is going on with both the reborrow and the cast in the same statement.

I am assuming that cast() is transforming to *Self, and the reborrow to &Self.

To be honest, I dislike this approach. My suggestion here is to rework it to be similar to, e.g., what
Alice did here for `ShrinkControl` [2].

+/// This struct is used to pass information from page reclaim to the shrinkers.
+///
+/// # Invariants
+///
+/// `ptr` has exclusive access to a valid `struct shrink_control`.
+pub struct ShrinkControl<'a> {
+ ptr: NonNull<bindings::shrink_control>,
+ _phantom: PhantomData<&'a bindings::shrink_control>,
+}
+
+impl<'a> ShrinkControl<'a> {
+ /// Create a `ShrinkControl` from a raw pointer.
+ ///
+ /// # Safety
+ ///
+ /// The pointer should point at a valid `shrink_control` for the duration of 'a.
+ pub unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: *mut bindings::shrink_control) -> Self {
+ Self {
+ // SAFETY: Caller promises that this pointer is valid.
+ ptr: unsafe { NonNull::new_unchecked(ptr) },
+ _phantom: PhantomData,
+ }
+ }

Notice the use of PhantomData in her patch.

By the way, Alice, I wonder if we can just use Opaque here?

> +    }

> +
> +    /// The number of color planes (1 to 3)
> +    pub const fn num_planes(&self) -> u8 {
> +        self.inner.num_planes
> +    }
> +
> +    /// Does the format embed an alpha component?
> +    pub const fn has_alpha(&self) -> bool {
> +        self.inner.has_alpha
> +    }
> +
> +    /// The total number of components (color planes + alpha channel, if there is one)
> +    pub const fn num_components(&self) -> u8 {
> +        self.num_planes() + self.has_alpha() as u8
> +    }
> +
> +    /// Number of bytes per block (per plane), where blocks are defined as a rectangle of pixels
> +    /// which are stored next to each other in a byte aligned memory region.
> +    pub fn char_per_block(&self) -> &[u8] {
> +        // SAFETY: The union we access here is just for descriptive purposes on the C side, both
> +        // members are identical in data layout
> +        unsafe { &self.inner.__bindgen_anon_1.char_per_block[..self.num_components() as _] }
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +impl AsRef<bindings::drm_format_info> for FormatInfo {
> +    fn as_ref(&self) -> &bindings::drm_format_info {
> +        &self.inner
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +impl From<bindings::drm_format_info> for FormatInfo {
> +    fn from(value: bindings::drm_format_info) -> Self {
> +        Self { inner: value }
> +    }
> +}
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/drm/mod.rs b/rust/kernel/drm/mod.rs
> index c44760a1332fa..2c12dbd181997 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/drm/mod.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/drm/mod.rs
> @@ -5,5 +5,6 @@
> pub mod device;
> pub mod drv;
> pub mod file;
> +pub mod fourcc;
> pub mod gem;
> pub mod ioctl;
> -- 
> 2.46.1

— Daniel

[0]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-bindgen/issues/753


[1]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nova/-/commit/cfd66f531af29e0616c58b4cd4c72770a5ac4081#71321381cbaa87053942373244bffe230e69392a_0_306

[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20241014-shrinker-v2-1-04719efd2342@google.com/




More information about the dri-devel mailing list