[PATCH v1 6/6] drm/mediatek: Add support for MT8195 Digital Parallel Interface

Wed Nov 27 08:41:41 UTC 2024

Il 27/11/24 08:02, CK Hu (胡俊光) ha scritto:
> On Tue, 2024-11-26 at 10:25 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content.
>>
>>
>> Il 26/11/24 04:07, CK Hu (胡俊光) ha scritto:
>>> On Mon, 2024-11-25 at 17:55 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>>> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Il 22/11/24 08:23, CK Hu (胡俊光) ha scritto:
>>>>> Hi, Angelo:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 2024-11-20 at 13:44 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>>>>> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add support for the DPI block found in the MT8195 and MT8188 SoCs.
>>>>>> Inside of the SoC, this block is directly connected to the HDMI IP.
>>>>>
>>>>> In MT8173, DPI0 is directly connected to HDMI.
>>>>> The first version of this driver is just for MT8173 DPI0.
>>>>> Does MT8173 DPI0 need this modification?
>>>>> Or this modification is just for MT8188 and MT8195, then the description should be more than 'directly connected'.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is only for MT8188 and MT8195, and MT8173 does *not* need any modification.
>>>>
>>>> Please, what would you like to see in the description of this commit?
>>>
>>> This patch does four jobs.
>>>
>>> 1. Enable/disable tvd_clk for MT8195/MT8188 DPI.
>>> 2. Do not set pixel clock for MT8195/MT8188 DPI.
>>> 3. New DPI_INPUT_XXX and DPI_OUTPUT_XXX control for MT8195/MT8188 DPI.
>>> 4. Do not power on/off for MT8195/MT8188 DPI.
>>>
>>> Maybe you should break into 4 patches and each one has different reason.
>>
>> Yeah I thought about that as well, but there's a fundamental issue with splitting
>> the thing in multiple patches...
>>
>> For enabling the tvd_clk in a separate patch, there's no problem - however, for the
>> others....
>>
>> 1. We need to introduce support for MT8195/88 DPI-HDMI, or the other patches would
>>      not make sense (nor apply, anyway); then
>> 2. We stop setting pixel clock with another patch; then
>> 3. we don't power on/off, etc etc
>>
>> The problem with doing it like so is that the patch #1 that I described would be
>> introducing *faulty code*, because the support for that really depends on all of
>> the others being present (otherwise the block won't work correctly).
>>
>> So... if you want, I can easily split out the tvd_clk enable/disable, but splitting
>> the rest wouldn't be clean.
>>
>> Besides, keep in mind that... actually... for anything else that is not MT8195/88
>> DPI0 (so, for other SoCs' DPI and for 95/88 DPINTF) the tvd_clk is already getting
>> enabled by its child.. so, for those ones, a call to enable tvd_clk does exactly
>> nothing apart from incrementing (enable) or decrementing (disable) the refcount for
>> this clock by 1.
>>
>> This means that the enablement/disablement of tvd_clk is actually important only
>> for the MT8195/88 DPI and has literally no effect on anything else that is
>> currently supported by the mtk_dpi driver anyway.
>>
>> Still - if you want me to split out the tvd_clk en/dis patch, just confirm and I
>> will split that one out...
>>
>>>
>>> For #1 and #2, I've not reviewed the HDMI driver. Is the clock control influenced by new HDMI driver.
>>
>> It kinda is - the HDMI-TX block gets its clock from the HDMI PHY's clock gen,
>> but eventually it is the HDMI driver that tells to the PHY driver what clock it
>> actually wants.
>>
>> For #1, clk_prepare_enable() is ungating the clock that would otherwise gate the
>> PHY's PLL output to the HDMI block.
>>
>>> If it is software reason, maybe we can modify the new HDMI driver and make DPI driver consistent with MT8173.
>>> If it is hardware reason. just describe the hardware reason.
>>
>> Alright - the hardware reason is that the HDMIPHY generates the clock for the HDMI
>> TX block, and that enabling the clock assigned to tvd_clk is necessary to ungate
>> the PHY's ckgen output to the HDMI-TX (and I think - but not sure as I haven't
>> analyzed that yet - that HDMI-RX should have the same gating technique, but that's
>> definitely out of scope for this submission).
> 
> I think tvd_clk is the clock source of DPI, HDMI, and HDMI-PHY, so these hardware could work in the same frequency.
> That means drivers of DPI, HDMI, and HDMI-PHY are equal to control tvd_clk.
> In MT8173. software choose DPI driver to control tvd_clk.
> In MT8195, software choose HDMI-PHY driver to control tvd_clk.

Yes, but in MT8195 the tvd is gated by a clock that is controller by the HDMI
driver only, and not by the PHY - so, PHY sets the frequency, mtk_hdmi_v2 ungates
that to the HDMITX block (with clk_prepare_enable(tvd_clk)).

> 
> I would like to have the same control flow.
> If "HDMI-PHY driver to control tvd_clk" is better, we could temporarily let MT8195 has different flow with MT8173.
> So, is "HDMI-PHY driver to control tvd_clk" better?
> 

I'm not sure I understand this last part, can you please rephrase?

>>
>>>
>>> For #4, I don't know why DPI do not control power by its self?
>>> Even though other driver may control the same power, power manager has reference count,
>>> so each driver could control the same power by its self.
>>
>> #4 is there both for a SW and for a HW reason.
>>
>> The HW reason is that the DPI shall be powered on in a specific sequence in regard
>> to HDMI-TX, due to the setup that is required by both (and ungating clocks before
>> full configuration happens would lock up the hw block).
>>
>> The SW reason is that mtk_crtc.c calls mtk_crtc_ddp_hw_init()->mtk_ddp_comp_start()
>> in its .atomic_enable() callback, which happens in the wrong sequence in regard to
>> HDMI because of the "natural" components order in the DRM framework (for MT8195/88!
>> because for the others it either is the inverse or it does not matter - so for
>> performance it's okay for it to be like that both on older SoCs and on DPINTF for
>> 95/88) and this means that we *must not* call dpi_power_on() at that time but
>> we must rather follow the atomic_enable()/bridge_enable() order imposed by DRM
>> *also* for the clock en/dis calls in DPI.
> 
> It looks like the #4 could be a separate patch.
> The commit message is what you describe here.
> And
> 
> if (!dpi->conf->support_hdmi_power_sequence)
> 	mtk_dpi_power_on();
> 

This means that I'd have to introduce the "hdmi power sequence" before actually
introducing the real support for MT8195 HDMI....
I honestly don't like that "too much", but it's fine, I don't have *too strong*
opinions about that, so I will separate #4 as you suggested for v2.

Cheers,
Angelo

> Regards,
> CK
> 
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Angelo
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> CK
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Angelo
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> CK
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>