[PATCH 1/1] platform/x86/tuxedo: Add virtual LampArray for TUXEDO NB04 devices

[Armin Wolf]

Am 02.10.24 um 10:42 schrieb Benjamin Tissoires:

> On Oct 01 2024, Werner Sembach wrote:
>> Hi Armin,
>>
>> Am 01.10.24 um 18:45 schrieb Armin Wolf:
> [...snipped...]
>>> Why not having a simple led driver for HID LampArray devices which exposes the
>>> whole LampArray as a single LED?
>> Yes that is my plan, but see my last reply to Benjamin, it might not be
>> trivial as different leds in the same LampArray might have different max
>> values for red, green, blue, and intensity. And the LampArray spec even
>> allows to mix RGB and non-RGB leds.
>>> If userspace wants to have direct control over the underlying LampArray device,
>>> it just needs to unbind the default driver (maybe udev can be useful here?).
>> There was something in the last discussion why this might not work, but i
>> can't put my finger on it.
> We recently have the exact same problem, so it's still fresh in my
> memory. And here are what is happening:
> - you can unbind the driver with a sysfs command for sure
> - but then the device is not attached to a driver so HID core doesn't
>    expose the hidraw node
> - you'd think "we can just rebind it to hid-generic", but that doesn't
>    work because hid-generic sees that there is already a loaded driver
>    that can handle the device and it'll reject itself because it gives
>    priority over the other driver
> - what works is that you might be able to unload the other driver, but
>    if it's already used by something else (like hid-multitouch), you
>    don't want to do that. And also if you unload that driver, whenever
>    the driver gets re-inserted, hid-generic will unbind itself, so back
>    to square one
>
> So unless we find a way to forward the "manual" binding to hid-generic,
> and/or we can also quirk the device with
> HID_QUIRK_IGNORE_SPECIAL_DRIVER[0] just unbinding the device doesn't
> work.
>
> Cheers,
> Benjamin

I see, maybe we can add support for the driver_override mechanism to the HID bus?
Basically userspace could use the driver_override mechanism to forcefully bind hid-generic
to a given HID device even if a compatible HID driver already exists.

Thanks,
Armin Wolf

> PS: brain fart:
> if HID LampArray support (whatever the implementation, through Pavel's
> new API or simple LED emulation) is in hid-input, we can also simply add
> a new HID quirk to enable this or not, and use that quirk dynamically
> (yes, with BPF :-P ) to rebind the device...
>
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/20241001-hid-bpf-hid-generic-v3-0-2ef1019468df@kernel.org/T/#t