[PATCH-next] Fix unintentional integer overflow

[Shuah Khan]

On 10/4/24 03:15, Sundararaju, Sathishkumar wrote:
> 
> All occurrences of this error fix should have been together in a single patch both in _get and _set callbacks corresponding to f0b19b84d391, please avoid separate patch for each occurrence.
> 
> Sorry Alex, I missed to note this yesterday.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Sathish

Sathish,

Please don't post on top when responding to kernel emails
and patches. It makes it difficult to follow the discussions

> 
> 
> On 10/4/2024 1:46 PM, Advait Dhamorikar wrote:
>> Fix shift-count-overflow when creating mask.
>> The expression's value may not be what the
>> programmer intended, because the expression is
>> evaluated using a narrower integer type.
>>
>> Fixes: f0b19b84d391 ("drm/amdgpu: add amdgpu_jpeg_sched_mask debugfs")
>> Signed-off-by: Advait Dhamorikar<advaitdhamorikar at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c
>> index 95e2796919fc..7df402c45f40 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c
>> @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_jpeg_sched_mask_get(void *data, u64 *val)
>>   		for (j = 0; j < adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings; ++j) {
>>   			ring = &adev->jpeg.inst[i].ring_dec[j];
>>   			if (ring->sched.ready)
>> -				mask |= 1 << ((i * adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings) + j);
>> +				mask |= (u64)1 << ((i * adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings) + j);
>>   		}
>>   	}
>>   	*val = mask;

thanks,
-- Shuah