[PATCH v2] locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements

Thomas Hellström thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com
Thu Oct 17 15:13:09 UTC 2024


On Wed, 2024-10-16 at 10:12 -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 08:17:50AM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> [...]
> > > 
> > > So even though first_lock_dep_map is a fake lock, it has to have
> > > the
> > > same wait types as a real mutex.
> > 
> > Understood.
> > > 
> > > Does this make sense?
> > 
> > Yes it does. I'll update to a v3, and add a Tested-by: tag. Would
> > you
> 
> I think you should send a v3 then after I test, I will send my
> Tested-by.
> 
> > like a Co-developed-by: tag as well?
> 
> It's not a big change onto yours, but feel free to add it.

It would probably have taken me considerable time to find that missing
LD_WAIT_SLEEP, but I forgot to ask for your S-O-B so I sent the patch
without. Perhaps can be added at commit time if needed.

Thanks again,
Thomas


> 
> Regards,
> Boqun
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Thomas
> > 
> > 
> [...]



More information about the dri-devel mailing list