[PATCH v4 RESEND 0/9] Increase coverage on drm_framebuffer.c
Maxime Ripard
mripard at kernel.org
Fri Sep 13 07:41:07 UTC 2024
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:31:08AM GMT, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2024, Maxime Ripard <mripard at kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 21:15:25 -0300, Carlos Eduardo Gallo Filho wrote:
> >> This patchset includes new KUnit tests for 5 untested functions from
> >> drm_framebuffer.c and improvements to the existent one.
> >>
> >> The first patch replace the use of dev_private member from drm_device
> >> mock on the existent test by embedding it into an outer struct containing
> >> a generic pointer.
> >>
> >> [...]
> >
> > Applied to misc/kernel.git (drm-misc-next).
>
> How was this series itself tested? It would be prudent to Cc: intel-gfx
> on stuff like this to run it through our CI. I don't think it ever
> passed [1].
I'm not sure what's going on, but:
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=drivers/gpu/drm//tests
Works like a charm with this series
Maxime
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 273 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20240913/8e6dac92/attachment.sig>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list