[PATCH v4 08/27] mfd: max77693: remove unused declarations

Dzmitry Sankouski dsankouski at gmail.com
Thu Sep 19 08:40:32 UTC 2024


чт, 19 сент. 2024 г. в 10:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>:
>
> On 18/09/2024 14:53, Dzmitry Sankouski wrote:
> > пн, 16 сент. 2024 г. в 12:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 06:07:51PM +0300, Dzmitry Sankouski wrote:
> >>> Remove `enum max77693_irq_source` declaration because unused.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Dzmitry Sankouski <dsankouski at gmail.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  include/linux/mfd/max77693-private.h | 11 -----------
> >>>  1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Please split your patchset per subsystems. There is no dependency on MFD
> >> bits from your DTS... (if there is, this needs to be fixed anyway)
> >
> > Indeed, my dts has no dependency on this patch.
> > However, my dts has dependency on MAX77705, so AFAIU,
> > I should send this patch separately, while leaving other drivers in same
> > patchset, right?
>
> How DTS could have dependency on MAX77705? It's a clear no go - broken
> patch. And something very weird, almost never happening for new hardware.
>
Oh right, dts only depends on driver bindings, not driver code, so I
can send dts
patches with bindings in separate series, and per subsystem series for new
driver code.


More information about the dri-devel mailing list