[PATCH 4/5] drm/msm/dpu: Add SA8775P support

Mahadevan P quic_mahap at quicinc.com
Tue Sep 24 12:31:06 UTC 2024


On 9/24/2024 5:46 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 04:42:02PM GMT, Mahadevan P wrote:
>> On 9/12/2024 1:34 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 12:44:36PM GMT, Mahadevan wrote:
>>>> Add definitions for the display hardware used on the
>>>> Qualcomm SA8775P platform.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mahadevan <quic_mahap at quicinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    .../msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_8_4_sa8775p.h   | 485 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c    |   3 +-
>>>>    .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h    |   3 +-
>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c       |   3 +-
>>>>    4 files changed, 491 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>    create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_8_4_sa8775p.h
>>>>
> [...]
>
>>>> +static const struct dpu_intf_cfg sa8775p_intf[] = {
>>>> +	{
>>>> +		.name = "intf_0", .id = INTF_0,
>>>> +		.base = 0x34000, .len = 0x280,
>>>> +		.features = INTF_SC7280_MASK,
>>>> +		.type = INTF_DP,
>>>> +		.controller_id = MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_0,
>>>> +		.prog_fetch_lines_worst_case = 24,
>>>> +		.intr_underrun = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 24),
>>>> +		.intr_vsync = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 25),
>>>> +	}, {
>>>> +		.name = "intf_1", .id = INTF_1,
>>>> +		.base = 0x35000, .len = 0x300,
>>>> +		.features = INTF_SC7280_MASK,
>>>> +		.type = INTF_DSI,
>>>> +		.controller_id = MSM_DSI_CONTROLLER_0,
>>>> +		.prog_fetch_lines_worst_case = 24,
>>>> +		.intr_underrun = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 26),
>>>> +		.intr_vsync = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 27),
>>>> +		.intr_tear_rd_ptr = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_INTF1_TEAR_INTR, 2),
>>>> +	}, {
>>>> +		.name = "intf_2", .id = INTF_2,
>>>> +		.base = 0x36000, .len = 0x300,
>>>> +		.features = INTF_SC7280_MASK,
>>>> +		.type = INTF_DSI,
>>>> +		.controller_id = MSM_DSI_CONTROLLER_1,
>>>> +		.prog_fetch_lines_worst_case = 24,
>>>> +		.intr_underrun = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 28),
>>>> +		.intr_vsync = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 29),
>>>> +		.intr_tear_rd_ptr = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_INTF2_TEAR_INTR, 2),
>>>> +	}, {
>>>> +		.name = "intf_3", .id = INTF_3,
>>>> +		.base = 0x37000, .len = 0x280,
>>>> +		.features = INTF_SC7280_MASK,
>>>> +		.type = INTF_NONE,
>>>> +		.controller_id = MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_0,	/* pair with intf_0 for DP MST */
>>>> +		.prog_fetch_lines_worst_case = 24,
>>>> +		.intr_underrun = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 30),
>>>> +		.intr_vsync = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 31),
>>>> +	}, {
>>>> +		.name = "intf_4", .id = INTF_4,
>>>> +		.base = 0x38000, .len = 0x280,
>>>> +		.features = INTF_SC7280_MASK,
>>>> +		.type = INTF_DP,
>>>> +		.controller_id = MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_1,
>>>> +		.prog_fetch_lines_worst_case = 24,
>>>> +		.intr_underrun = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 20),
>>>> +		.intr_vsync = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 21),
>>>> +	}, {
>>> Where is intf_5 ?
>>
>> intf_5 of base address 0x39000 is not supported on this target.
> Not supported by whom?


In sa8775p mdss architecture intf_5 is not present. So we are not adding 
in SW too.


>
>>
>>>> +		.name = "intf_6", .id = INTF_6,
>>>> +		.base = 0x3A000, .len = 0x280,
>>>> +		.features = INTF_SC7280_MASK,
>>>> +		.type = INTF_NONE,
>>>> +		.controller_id = MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_0,	/* pair with intf_0 for DP MST */
>>>> +		.prog_fetch_lines_worst_case = 24,
>>>> +		.intr_underrun = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 17),
>>>> +		.intr_vsync = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 16),
>>>> +	}, {
> [skipped]
>
>>>> @@ -1464,6 +1464,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id dpu_dt_match[] = {
>>>>    	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-dpu", .data = &dpu_sm8250_cfg, },
>>>>    	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dpu", .data = &dpu_sm8350_cfg, },
>>>>    	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-dpu", .data = &dpu_sm8450_cfg, },
>>>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-dpu", .data = &dpu_sa8775p_cfg, },
>>> Wrong sorting order
>>
>> Sure will move below sm8650-dpu.
> What makes you think that in a dictionary sa8775p comes after sm8650?


Will update according to alphabetical order in next patch.


>
>>
>>>>    	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8550-dpu", .data = &dpu_sm8550_cfg, },
>>>>    	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8650-dpu", .data = &dpu_sm8650_cfg, },
>>>>    	{ .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-dpu", .data = &dpu_x1e80100_cfg, },
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>


More information about the dri-devel mailing list