[PATCH v2] drm/amdgpu: add dce6 drm_panic support

Jocelyn Falempe jfalempe at redhat.com
Wed Sep 25 09:30:53 UTC 2024


On 25/09/2024 09:55, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 2024-09-24 16:02, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 11:36 AM Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 17/09/2024 15:21, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 2:10 AM Lu Yao <yaolu at kylinos.cn> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Add support for the drm_panic module, which displays a pretty user
>>>>> friendly message on the screen when a Linux kernel panic occurs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lu Yao <yaolu at kylinos.cn>
>>>>
>>>> Patch looks good to me.  Any chance you want to convert the other
>>>> non-DC dce files (dce_v8_0.c, dce_v10_0.c, dce_v11_0.c) while you are
>>>> at it?
>>>
>>> I've made a similar patch in amdgpu_dm_plane.c, and it works on a Radeon
>>> pro w6400.
>>> But it only works when I'm in a VT terminal (so the framebuffer is
>>> linear and CPU accessible).
>>> When under Gnome/Wayland, the flag AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_NO_CPU_ACCESS is
>>> set, so that means I can't vmap it ?
>>
>> It just means that the application does not need CPU access.  Whether
>> or not the CPU can access the buffer or not depends on the size of the
>> PCI BAR.  E.g., if the driver or bios has resized the PCI BAR, then
>> the CPU can access the entire BAR, but if not you are generally
>> limited to the first 256M of framebuffer.
> 
> FWIW, it's also possible to access all of VRAM via MMIO indirect registers. That'll be slower than a direct CPU map, it might be acceptable for drm_panic though, at least as a fallback.
> 
> 
Thanks, I will try that too. For panic, we only need to write the 
framebuffer once, so performances doesn't really matter.

I will try to use amdgpu_device_mm_access() for that.

-- 

Jocelyn



More information about the dri-devel mailing list