[PATCH v3 00/16] Introduce and use generic parity16/32/64 helper

[Jeremy Kerr]

Hi Kuan-Wei,

> Thanks for your feedback.

No problem!

> IIUC, from the fsi-i2c perspective, parity efficiency isn't a major
> concern,

Yes

> but you still prefer optimizing with methods like __builtin_parity().

No, it's not really about optimisation. In the case of this driver, my
preference would be more directed to using common code (either in the
form of these changes, or __builtin_parity) rather than any performance
considerations.

The implementation details I gave was more a note about the platforms
that are applicable for the driver.

Cheers,


Jeremy