[PATCH RESEND] drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/fiji_smumgr: Fix wrong return value of fiji_populate_smc_boot_level()
Alex Deucher
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Mon Apr 14 13:29:12 UTC 2025
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 3:24 AM Wentao Liang <vulab at iscas.ac.cn> wrote:
>
> The return value of fiji_populate_smc_boot_level() is always 0, which
> represent the failure of the function. The result of phm_find_boot_level()
> should be recored and return. An error handling is also needed to
> phm_find_boot_level() to reset the boot level when the function fails.
> A proper implementation can be found in tonga_populate_smc_boot_level().
>
> Fixes: dcaf3483ae46 ("drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/fiji_smumgr: Remove unused variable 'result'")
> Signed-off-by: Wentao Liang <vulab at iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> .../drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/fiji_smumgr.c | 23 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/fiji_smumgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/fiji_smumgr.c
> index 5e43ad2b2956..7d0cb3741b94 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/fiji_smumgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/fiji_smumgr.c
> @@ -1600,19 +1600,28 @@ static int fiji_populate_smc_uvd_level(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
> static int fiji_populate_smc_boot_level(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
> struct SMU73_Discrete_DpmTable *table)
> {
> + int result = 0;
> struct smu7_hwmgr *data = (struct smu7_hwmgr *)(hwmgr->backend);
>
> table->GraphicsBootLevel = 0;
> table->MemoryBootLevel = 0;
>
> /* find boot level from dpm table */
> - phm_find_boot_level(&(data->dpm_table.sclk_table),
> - data->vbios_boot_state.sclk_bootup_value,
> - (uint32_t *)&(table->GraphicsBootLevel));
> + result = phm_find_boot_level(&(data->dpm_table.sclk_table),
> + data->vbios_boot_state.sclk_bootup_value,
> + (uint32_t *)&(table->GraphicsBootLevel));
> + if (result) {
> + table->GraphicsBootLevel = 0;
> + return 0;
This will skip setting the voltages later below.
> + }
>
> - phm_find_boot_level(&(data->dpm_table.mclk_table),
> - data->vbios_boot_state.mclk_bootup_value,
> - (uint32_t *)&(table->MemoryBootLevel));
> + result = phm_find_boot_level(&(data->dpm_table.mclk_table),
> + data->vbios_boot_state.mclk_bootup_value,
> + (uint32_t *)&(table->MemoryBootLevel));
> + if (result) {
> + table->MemoryBootLevel = 0;
> + return 0;
Same here.
If you are intending to match the logic in
tonga_populate_smc_boot_level(), the existing code already does that
(minus the error message). This change would break that. Returning
early may break working devices.
Alex
> + }
>
> table->BootVddc = data->vbios_boot_state.vddc_bootup_value *
> VOLTAGE_SCALE;
> @@ -1625,7 +1634,7 @@ static int fiji_populate_smc_boot_level(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
> CONVERT_FROM_HOST_TO_SMC_US(table->BootVddci);
> CONVERT_FROM_HOST_TO_SMC_US(table->BootMVdd);
>
> - return 0;
> + return result;
> }
>
> static int fiji_populate_smc_initailial_state(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
> --
> 2.42.0.windows.2
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list