[PATCH 1/4] drm/rcar-du: dsi: Convert register bits to BIT() macro

Marek Vasut marek.vasut at mailbox.org
Tue Aug 12 19:32:36 UTC 2025


On 8/12/25 3:26 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

Hi,

>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi_regs.h
>> index a6b276f1d6ee..b3e57217ae63 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi_regs.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi_regs.h

[...]

>> @@ -51,11 +51,11 @@
>>   
>>   #define TXVMVPRMSET0R			0x1d0
>>   #define TXVMVPRMSET0R_HSPOL_HIG		(0 << 17)
>> -#define TXVMVPRMSET0R_HSPOL_LOW		(1 << 17)
>> +#define TXVMVPRMSET0R_HSPOL_LOW		BIT(17)
> 
> I'm not sure about this (and below). We have two defines for the HSPOL,
> high and low. If one of them is (x << y), shouldn't the other one be of
> that style too?
It is inconsistent, but one macro describes bit set to 0 and the other 
bit set to 1 (i.e. the actual bit) which is converted to BIT(n) macro. I 
would be tempted to remove the bits set to 0, that's probably the real 
discussion that should happen here. But that would also be a much bigger 
patch. What do you think ?


More information about the dri-devel mailing list