[PATCH v4 17/33] drm/xe: Do not allow CPU address mirror VMA unbind if the GPU has bindings

[Thomas Hellström]

On Wed, 2025-01-29 at 11:51 -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> uAPI is designed with the use case that only mapping a BO to a
> malloc'd
> address will unbind a CPU-address mirror VMA. Therefore, allowing a
> CPU-address mirror VMA to unbind when the GPU has bindings in the
> range
> being unbound does not make much sense. This behavior is not
> supported,
> as it simplifies the code. This decision can always be revisited if a
> use case arises.
> 
> v3:
>  - s/arrises/arises (Thomas)
>  - s/system allocator/GPU address mirror (Thomas)
>  - Kernel doc (Thomas)
>  - Newline between function defs (Thomas)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c |  5 +++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h |  2 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c  | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> index 03c5cbcacb0e..56ece53b2069 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.c
> @@ -428,3 +428,8 @@ int xe_svm_handle_pagefault(struct xe_vm *vm,
> struct xe_vma *vma,
>  
>  	return err;
>  }
> +
> +bool xe_svm_has_mapping(struct xe_vm *vm, u64 start, u64 end)

Kerneldoc?

> +{
> +	return drm_gpusvm_has_mapping(&vm->svm.gpusvm, start, end);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> index ef5bc4e919e8..b181c174ca61 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_svm.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ int xe_svm_handle_pagefault(struct xe_vm *vm,
> struct xe_vma *vma,
>  			    struct xe_tile *tile, u64 fault_addr,
>  			    bool atomic);
>  
> +bool xe_svm_has_mapping(struct xe_vm *vm, u64 start, u64 end);
> +
>  static inline bool xe_svm_range_pages_valid(struct xe_svm_range
> *range)
And here.

>  {
>  	return drm_gpusvm_range_pages_valid(range->base.gpusvm,
> &range->base);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> index 6fa446884955..d8c78ecd54ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -2398,6 +2398,17 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse(struct
> xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops,
>  			struct xe_vma *old =
>  				gpuva_to_vma(op->base.remap.unmap-
> >va);
>  			bool skip = xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(old);
> +			u64 start = xe_vma_start(old), end =
> xe_vma_end(old);
> +
> +			if (op->base.remap.prev)
> +				start = op->base.remap.prev->va.addr
> +
> +					op->base.remap.prev-
> >va.range;
> +			if (op->base.remap.next)
> +				end = op->base.remap.next->va.addr;
> +
> +			if (xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(old) &&
> +			    xe_svm_has_mapping(vm, start, end))
> +				return -EBUSY;
>  
>  			op->remap.start = xe_vma_start(old);
>  			op->remap.range = xe_vma_size(old);
> @@ -2480,6 +2491,11 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse(struct
> xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops,
>  		{
>  			struct xe_vma *vma = gpuva_to_vma(op-
> >base.unmap.va);
>  
> +			if (xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma) &&
> +			    xe_svm_has_mapping(vm,
> xe_vma_start(vma),
> +					       xe_vma_end(vma)))
> +				return -EBUSY;
> +
>  			if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma))
>  				xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops,
> op->tile_mask);
>  			break;

Thanks,
Thomas