[PATCH v4 3/3] drm/i915/display: Add i915 hook for format_mod_supported_async
Murthy, Arun R
arun.r.murthy at intel.com
Wed Feb 12 14:59:05 UTC 2025
On 12-02-2025 13:02, Borah, Chaitanya Kumar wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Murthy, Arun R<arun.r.murthy at intel.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 3:57 PM
>> To:dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org;intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; intel-
>> xe at lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Borah, Chaitanya Kumar<chaitanya.kumar.borah at intel.com>; Syrjala,
>> Ville<ville.syrjala at intel.com>; Murthy, Arun R<arun.r.murthy at intel.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/i915/display: Add i915 hook for
>> format_mod_supported_async
>>
>> Hook up the newly added plane function pointer
>> format_mod_supported_async to populate the modifiers/formats supported
>> by asynchronous flips.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy<arun.r.murthy at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++-
>> -----
>> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
>> index
>> ba5db553c374259f8f3246c1408b55d32c8794e5..96d53b22715cf397483acbdb
>> 23b4dd60d6cbb604 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
>> @@ -511,6 +511,33 @@ skl_plane_max_stride(struct intel_plane *plane,
>> modifier, rotation,
>> max_pixels, max_bytes);
>> }
>> +static bool intel_plane_async_formats(struct intel_plane *plane,
>> +uint32_t format) {
>> + switch (format) {
>> + case DRM_FORMAT_RGB565:
>> + case DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888:
>> + case DRM_FORMAT_XBGR8888:
>> + case DRM_FORMAT_ARGB8888:
>> + case DRM_FORMAT_ABGR8888:
>> + case DRM_FORMAT_XRGB2101010:
>> + case DRM_FORMAT_XBGR2101010:
>> + case DRM_FORMAT_XRGB16161616F:
>> + case DRM_FORMAT_XBGR16161616F:
>> + return true;
>> + default:
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool intel_plane_format_mod_supported_async(struct drm_plane
>> *plane,
>> + uint32_t format,
>> + uint64_t modifier)
>> +{
>> + if (intel_plane_can_async_flip(to_intel_plane(plane), modifier))
>> + return false;
> This should be
>
> if (!intel_plane_can_async_flip(to_intel_plane(plane), modifier))
Typo from my side, corrected!
> I think we should eventually move to a switch case ladder that actually checks for compatibility among format-modifier pair
> rather than checking them individually. Though we don't have a good use of it today, we might end up having scenarios where some formats
> are supported only for certain modifiers and vice versa. But it can be taken up later.
I am fine! I can switch back to my previous patchset from which
achieving this switch case latter is much easier.
> I see some comments made on rev 2 [1] regarding re-using the format_mod_sync() hook for this.
> I have not yet formed a strong opinion about it and with the above suggested change, it at least seems to work.
The comment from rev 2 [1] is
> > intel_plane_format_mod_supported_async()
> > {
> > // some generic checks here (eg. reject planar formats)
> >
> > return plane->format_mod_supported() &&
> > plane->can_async_flip();
> > }
Here some generic checks to reject plannar formats is being done from
intel_plane_async_formats() After this we have the result as to if the
format is supported for not and with plane->can_async_flip we have a
result of modifier being supported or not. That itself should be
sufficient. If you still prefer to make use of the call
plane->format_mod_supported() with some hacks can be done. Let me know!
> [1]https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/631264/?series=140935&rev=2
>
>> +
>> + return intel_plane_async_formats(to_intel_plane(plane), format); }
>>
>> static bool tgl_plane_can_async_flip(u64 modifier) { @@ -2559,30 +2586,29
>> @@ static bool tgl_plane_format_mod_supported(struct drm_plane *_plane,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +#define INTEL_PLANE_FUNCS \
>> + .update_plane = drm_atomic_helper_update_plane, \
>> + .disable_plane = drm_atomic_helper_disable_plane, \
>> + .destroy = intel_plane_destroy, \
>> + .atomic_duplicate_state = intel_plane_duplicate_state, \
>> + .atomic_destroy_state = intel_plane_destroy_state, \
>> + .format_mod_supported_async =
>> intel_plane_format_mod_supported_async
>> +
>> static const struct drm_plane_funcs skl_plane_funcs = {
>> - .update_plane = drm_atomic_helper_update_plane,
>> - .disable_plane = drm_atomic_helper_disable_plane,
>> - .destroy = intel_plane_destroy,
>> - .atomic_duplicate_state = intel_plane_duplicate_state,
>> - .atomic_destroy_state = intel_plane_destroy_state,
>> + INTEL_PLANE_FUNCS,
>> +
>> .format_mod_supported = skl_plane_format_mod_supported, };
>>
>> static const struct drm_plane_funcs icl_plane_funcs = {
>> - .update_plane = drm_atomic_helper_update_plane,
>> - .disable_plane = drm_atomic_helper_disable_plane,
>> - .destroy = intel_plane_destroy,
>> - .atomic_duplicate_state = intel_plane_duplicate_state,
>> - .atomic_destroy_state = intel_plane_destroy_state,
>> + INTEL_PLANE_FUNCS,
>> +
>> .format_mod_supported = icl_plane_format_mod_supported, };
>>
>> static const struct drm_plane_funcs tgl_plane_funcs = {
>> - .update_plane = drm_atomic_helper_update_plane,
>> - .disable_plane = drm_atomic_helper_disable_plane,
>> - .destroy = intel_plane_destroy,
>> - .atomic_duplicate_state = intel_plane_duplicate_state,
>> - .atomic_destroy_state = intel_plane_destroy_state,
>> + INTEL_PLANE_FUNCS,
>> +
>> .format_mod_supported = tgl_plane_format_mod_supported, };
>>
> This leads to exposing the property even on planes that do not support async flip.
> Functionally it should not be a problem as can_async is exposed only for primary plane.
Yes property will be created for all the planes but data will be
populated only for primary plane.
Thanks and Regards,
Arun R Murthy
-------------------
>
> May be we can live with it for now. Ville any thoughts?
>
> Regards
>
> Chaitanya
>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20250212/2231d8eb/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list