[PATCH] drm/i915/uc: Include requested frequency in slow firmware load messages
Krzysztof Karas
krzysztof.karas at intel.com
Thu Jan 16 11:52:39 UTC 2025
Hi John,
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
>
> To aid debug of sporadic issues, include the requested frequency in
> the debug message as well as the actual frequency. That way we know
> for certain that the clamping is not because the driver forgot to ask.
>
...
> } else if (delta_ms > 200) {
> guc_warn(guc, "excessive init time: %lldms! [status = 0x%08X, count = %d, ret = %d]\n",
> delta_ms, status, count, ret);
> - guc_warn(guc, "excessive init time: [freq = %dMHz, before = %dMHz, perf_limit_reasons = 0x%08X]\n",
> - intel_rps_read_actual_frequency(>->rps), before_freq,
> + guc_warn(guc, "excessive init time: [freq = %dMHz -> %dMHz vs %dMHz, perf_limit_reasons = 0x%08X]\n",
> + before_freq, intel_rps_read_actual_frequency(>->rps),
> + intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(>->rps),
While, <value> -> <value> is clear to me if I were to encounter
this type of log, I wonder if it would be apparent what "vs"
means here without having to look into the code. Maybe it would
be worth to add "vs actual:" or ", actual:" instead?
Krzysztof
> intel_uncore_read(uncore, intel_gt_perf_limit_reasons_reg(gt)));
> } else {
> - guc_dbg(guc, "init took %lldms, freq = %dMHz, before = %dMHz, status = 0x%08X, count = %d, ret = %d\n",
> - delta_ms, intel_rps_read_actual_frequency(>->rps),
> - before_freq, status, count, ret);
> + guc_dbg(guc, "init took %lldms, freq = %dMHz -> %dMHz vs %dMHz, status = 0x%08X, count = %d, ret = %d\n",
> + delta_ms, before_freq, intel_rps_read_actual_frequency(>->rps),
> + intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(>->rps), status, count, ret);
...
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list