AAARRRGGGHHH!!!! (was Re: [PATCH 6.12.y] xe/oa: Fix query mode of operation for OAR/OAC)
Greg KH
gregkh at linuxfoundation.org
Fri Jan 17 11:25:37 UTC 2025
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 12:01:01PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 10:06:42PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > That's fine, the issue is that you are the only ones with "duplicate"
> > commits in the tree that are both tagged for stable, every release.
>
> Isn't a solution as easy as teaching your tooling not to create/accept
> commits on -next with Cc: stable? This way folks intending to push a
> change will notice it should go to the fixes branch. And if only
> afterwards you notice this is a critical fix that should get backported
> at least the commit that takes more time entering mainline doesn't have
> the stable tag.
>
> Maybe additionally make sure that Fixes: and revert notices only point
> to commits that are an ancestor.
The commit is always an ancestor, the "trick" is which one when the
ancestor was cherry-picked previously? That's the real problem here..
gre k-h
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list