[PATCH v1 07/12] mm/page_vma_mapped: device-private entries are not migration entries

David Hildenbrand david at redhat.com
Fri Jan 31 11:06:42 UTC 2025


On 31.01.25 00:36, Alistair Popple wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:54:05PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> It's unclear why they would be considered migration entries; they are
>> not.
> 
> Yeah, I agree that doesn't seem right. I suspect I was initially modelling
> device exclusive entries similar to migration entries but obviously went too
> far. So thanks for fixing:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple at nvidia.com>

Thanks ... fixing all the wrong use of "device-private" in the 
subject+description ... not sure what my mind was doing there.

It's all about "device-exclusive" of course.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb



More information about the dri-devel mailing list