[PATCH v2 05/12] drm/exynos: exynos_dp: Remove redundant &analogix_dp_plat_data.skip_connector

[Heiko Stübner]

Hi Damon,

Am Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2025, 09:01:32 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Damon Ding:
> The &analogix_dp_plat_data.skip_connector related check can be replaced
> by &analogix_dp_plat_data.bridge.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Damon Ding <damon.ding at rock-chips.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c
> index 9d7d3f009e58..9e1313fdecad 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp.c
> @@ -237,7 +237,6 @@ static int exynos_dp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	dp->plat_data.power_off = exynos_dp_poweroff;
>  	dp->plat_data.attach = exynos_dp_bridge_attach;
>  	dp->plat_data.get_modes = exynos_dp_get_modes;
> -	dp->plat_data.skip_connector = !!bridge;
>  
>  out:
>  	dp->adp = analogix_dp_probe(dev, &dp->plat_data);
> 

I think you might want to merge 
- drm/exynos: exynos_dp: Remove redundant &analogix_dp_plat_data.skip_connector
- drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Remove redundant &analogix_dp_plat_data.skip_connector

Because when separate this creates a bisection issue.
Like when a bisect happens to land directly on this commit, you already have
removed the exynos assignment, but the updated check from the following patch
is not yet in place.