[PATCH 18/19] drm/msm/dp: Move link training to atomic_enable()
Dmitry Baryshkov
dmitry.baryshkov at oss.qualcomm.com
Mon Jul 14 11:54:12 UTC 2025
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 05:58:23PM -0700, Jessica Zhang wrote:
> Currently, the DP link training is being done during HPD. Move
> link training to atomic_enable() in accordance with the atomic_enable()
> documentation.
>
> In addition, don't disable the link until atomic_post_disable() (as part
> of the dp_ctrl_off[_link_stream]() helpers).
>
> Since the link training is moved to a later part of the enable sequence,
> change the bridge detect() to return true when the display is physically
> connected instead of when the link is ready.
These two parts should be patch #2 in the series.
>
> Finally, call the plug/unplug handlers directly in hpd_notify() instead
> of queueing them in the event thread so that they aren't preempted by
> other events.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang at oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> index 87f2750a99ca..32e1ee40c2c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> @@ -410,11 +410,6 @@ static int msm_dp_display_process_hpd_high(struct msm_dp_display_private *dp)
> msm_dp_link_psm_config(dp->link, &dp->panel->link_info, false);
>
> msm_dp_link_reset_phy_params_vx_px(dp->link);
> - rc = msm_dp_ctrl_on_link(dp->ctrl);
> - if (rc) {
> - DRM_ERROR("failed to complete DP link training\n");
> - goto end;
> - }
>
> msm_dp_add_event(dp, EV_USER_NOTIFICATION, true, 0);
>
> @@ -1561,6 +1556,12 @@ void msm_dp_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *drm_bridge,
> force_link_train = true;
> }
>
> + rc = msm_dp_ctrl_on_link(msm_dp_display->ctrl);
> + if (rc) {
> + DRM_ERROR("Failed link training (rc=%d)\n", rc);
> + dp->connector->state->link_status = DRM_LINK_STATUS_BAD;
> + }
> +
> msm_dp_display_enable(msm_dp_display, force_link_train);
>
> rc = msm_dp_display_post_enable(dp);
> @@ -1706,7 +1707,7 @@ void msm_dp_bridge_hpd_notify(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> return;
>
> if (!msm_dp_display->link_ready && status == connector_status_connected)
> - msm_dp_add_event(dp, EV_HPD_PLUG_INT, 0, 0);
> + msm_dp_hpd_plug_handle(dp, 0);
> else if (msm_dp_display->link_ready && status == connector_status_disconnected)
> - msm_dp_add_event(dp, EV_HPD_UNPLUG_INT, 0, 0);
> + msm_dp_hpd_unplug_handle(dp, 0);
This chunk should be separated from this patch. I'd ask to drop
EV_HPD_PLUG_INT / EV_HPD_UNPLUG_INT completely and call DRM functions
all over the place instead. You can do it in a single patch, which comes
after this one.
> }
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list