[PATCH RFC net-next 0/5] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: add AF_XDP zero copy support
Jakub Kicinski
kuba at kernel.org
Mon Jul 14 15:06:29 UTC 2025
On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 14:50:05 +0530 Malladi, Meghana wrote:
> > AF_XDP performance using 64 byte packets in Kpps.
> > Benchmark: XDP-SKB XDP-Native XDP-Native(ZeroCopy)
> > rxdrop 317 504 824
> > txonly 400 405 757
> > l2fwd 207 264 0
> >
> > AF_XDP performance using 1500 byte packets in Kpps.
> > Benchmark: XDP-SKB XDP-Native XDP-Native(ZeroCopy)
> > rxdrop 82 82 82
> > txonly 82 82 82
> > l2fwd 82 82 82
> >
> > [1]: https://github.com/xdp-project/bpf-examples/tree/master/AF_XDP-example
> >
> > To:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq at kernel.org>
>
> This series crashes Linux on am64xx-hsevm, when I tried nfs boot using
> AM65-CPSW-NUSS driver:
> logs:
> https://gist.github.com/MeghanaMalladiTI/d655a1c8ca88113ee7f5f57d6ab0ec4c
>
> Seems like you have reverted the fix for the same bug which was reported
> by Siddharth and fixed by Julien:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/7f7fb71a-6d15-46f1-b63c-b569a2e230b7@baylibre.com/
>
> reverted lines:
> if (!common->ports[port].ndev)
> /* FIXME should we BUG here? */
> continue;
>
> Can you please take a look at it.
Just to be clear -- you're reporting this problem to Roger so that its
fixed before the series is reposted? I don't see this in the tree, I
wanted to make sure it's not something I need to track as a regression.
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list