[PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip: rk3399-typec-phy: Support mode/orientation switch

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 15/07/2025 13:24, Chaoyi Chen wrote:
> From: Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.chen at rock-chips.com>
> 
> Add support for Type-C orientation and altmode switch.
> The Type-C controller can be specified to handling switching.

Please describe the hardware in details. Above sentences don't help me
to understand this.


> 
> Signed-off-by: Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.chen at rock-chips.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3399-typec-phy.yaml    | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3399-typec-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3399-typec-phy.yaml
> index 91c011f68cd0..a885c6893a90 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3399-typec-phy.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3399-typec-phy.yaml
> @@ -43,6 +43,20 @@ properties:
>      description:
>        Phandle to the syscon managing the "general register files" (GRF).
>  
> +  orientation-switch:
> +    description: Flag the port as possible handler of orientation switching
> +    type: boolean
> +
> +  mode-switch:
> +    description: Flag the port as possible handler of altmode switching
> +    type: boolean
> +
> +  port:
> +    $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
> +    description:
> +      A port node to link the PHY to a TypeC controller for the purpose of
> +      handling orientation switching.


You are using usb-switch.yaml properties in phy node, which raises
questions whether this is actually complete. It might be, but commit msg
is so vague that I have doubts.

Also, why only one port?

Or wait... you already have ports! two of them. This needs to stop, why
are you adding more?

Best regards,
Krzysztof