linux-next: Tree for Jul 21 [drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe.ko]

[Lucas De Marchi]

On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 01:17:33PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>
>On 7/21/25 12:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20250718:
>>
>
>on ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386, when
># CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not set

can you share your entire config? I have all of the settings above, but
I can't reproduce it with gcc-13. Is this a regression from the previous
-next tag? I think the diff below should fix it, but I can't confirm on
my end nor I see how this would be a regression from a few days ago
only.

-----8<-------
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.h
index e9ccab8aedbef..41880979f4ded 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.h
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
  extern struct fault_attr gt_reset_failure;
  static inline bool xe_fault_inject_gt_reset(void)
  {
-	return should_fail(&gt_reset_failure, 1);
+	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) && should_fail(&gt_reset_failure, 1);
  }
  
  struct xe_gt *xe_gt_alloc(struct xe_tile *tile);
-----8<-------

thanks,
Lucas De Marchi

>
>ERROR: modpost: "gt_reset_failure" [drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe.ko] undefined!

>
>-- 
>~Randy
>