[PATCH v5 1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: add epd hpd pinctrl

[Neil Armstrong]

On 11/04/2025 13:49, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 03:36:32PM +0100, Christopher Obbard wrote:
>> Add edp_hpd_active pinctrl to the X1E80100 device tree.
> 
> Please squash this one with the patch adding the user.
>   
>> Signed-off-by: Christopher Obbard <christopher.obbard at linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
>> index 46b79fce92c90d969e3de48bc88e27915d1592bb..5b1b80c445404fd02e9f6e5dab207610b03ff9c5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
>> @@ -6389,6 +6389,11 @@ data-pins {
>>   					bias-pull-up;
>>   				};
>>   			};
>> +
>> +			edp_hpd_active: edp-hpd-active-state {
> 
> Please keep the nodes sorted by name.
> 
>> +				pins = "gpio119";
>> +				function = "edp_hot";
> 
> There is no "edp_hot" function on x1e so I wonder how this has been
> tested.
> 
> As I mentioned in a comment to an earlier revision this pin has been
> configured by the firmware as "edp0_hot".

With edp_hot, screen stays black with UI comes up, with edp0_hot it works again.

> 
> Since there is also an "edp1_hot" pin, this needs to be reflected in the
> node name and label.
> 
> Pin configurations really do belong in board files, but unfortunately
> this was not followed for x1e. You should still include the bias
> configuration (somewhere).

Which bias ? do this pin config needs an additional bias config ?

Neil

> 
>> +			};
>>   		};
>>   
>>   		stm at 10002000 {
> 
> Johan