[PATCH 12/17] drm/msm: Skip devfreq IDLE when possible
Konrad Dybcio
konrad.dybcio at oss.qualcomm.com
Wed Jul 23 10:28:14 UTC 2025
On 7/20/25 2:16 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> When IFPC is supported, devfreq idling is redundant and adds
> unnecessary pm suspend/wake latency. So skip it when IFPC is
> supported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo at oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c
> index 2e1d5c3432728cde15d91f69da22bb915588fe86..53ef2add5047e7d6b6371af949cab36ce8409372 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> * Author: Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com>
> */
>
> +#include "adreno/adreno_gpu.h"
> #include "msm_gpu.h"
> #include "msm_gpu_trace.h"
>
> @@ -300,6 +301,8 @@ void msm_devfreq_active(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
> return;
>
> + if (to_adreno_gpu(gpu)->info->quirks & ADRENO_QUIRK_IFPC)
> + return;
Do we want a static_branch here instead?
Konrad
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list