[PATCH 09/17] drm/msm/a6xx: Switch to GMU AO counter
Rob Clark
rob.clark at oss.qualcomm.com
Wed Jul 23 12:15:41 UTC 2025
On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 3:19 AM Konrad Dybcio
<konrad.dybcio at oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/20/25 2:16 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> > CP_ALWAYS_ON counter falls under GX domain which is collapsed during
> > IFPC. So switch to GMU_ALWAYS_ON counter for any CPU reads since it is
> > not impacted by IFPC. Both counters are clocked by same xo clock source.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo at oss.qualcomm.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> > index 6770f0363e7284e4596b1188637a4615d2c0779b..f000915a4c2698a85b45bd3c92e590f14999d10d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> > @@ -16,6 +16,19 @@
> >
> > #define GPU_PAS_ID 13
> >
> > +static u64 read_gmu_ao_counter(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
> > +{
> > + u64 count_hi, count_lo, temp;
> > +
> > + do {
> > + count_hi = gmu_read(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_H);
> > + count_lo = gmu_read(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_L);
> > + temp = gmu_read(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_H);
> > + } while (count_hi != temp);
>
> The original logic is as follows:
>
> static u64 gen7_read_alwayson(struct adreno_device *adreno_dev)
> {
> struct kgsl_device *device = KGSL_DEVICE(adreno_dev);
> u32 lo = 0, hi = 0, tmp = 0;
>
> /* Always use the GMU AO counter when doing a AHB read */
> gmu_core_regread(device, GEN7_GMU_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_H, &hi);
> gmu_core_regread(device, GEN7_GMU_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_L, &lo);
>
> /* Check for overflow */
> gmu_core_regread(device, GEN7_GMU_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_H, &tmp);
>
> if (hi != tmp) {
> gmu_core_regread(device, GEN7_GMU_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_L,
> &lo);
> hi = tmp;
> }
>
> return (((u64) hi) << 32) | lo;
> }
>
> Doing this in a while-loop almost looks like you want a lot of time to
> pass - REG_WIDTH(u32?)/19.2 MHz
would:
} while (unlikely(count_hi != temp));
make it more clear?
> Konrad
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list