[PATCH v2 2/6] ALSA: Add definitions for the bits in IEC958 subframe

[Takashi Iwai]

On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 12:14:10 +0200,
Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 3:40 PM Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl at pengutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > On 24.07.2025 09:37:09, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 09:22:44 +0200,
> > > Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The IEC958 subframe format SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_IEC958_SUBFRAME_LE are used
> > > > in HDMI and DisplayPort to describe the audio stream, but hardware device
> > > > may need to reorder the IEC958 bits for internal transmission, so need
> > > > these standard bits definitions for IEC958 subframe format.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang at nxp.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  include/sound/asoundef.h | 9 +++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/sound/asoundef.h b/include/sound/asoundef.h
> > > > index 09b2c3dffb30..7efd61568636 100644
> > > > --- a/include/sound/asoundef.h
> > > > +++ b/include/sound/asoundef.h
> > > > @@ -12,6 +12,15 @@
> > > >   *        Digital audio interface                                      *
> > > >   *                                                                          *
> > > >   ****************************************************************************/
> > > > +/* IEC958 subframe format */
> > > > +#define IEC958_SUBFRAME_PREAMBLE_MASK      (0xf)
> > > > +#define IEC958_SUBFRAME_AUXILIARY_MASK     (0xf<<4)
> > > > +#define IEC958_SUBFRAME_SAMPLE_24_MASK     (0xffffff<<4)
> > > > +#define IEC958_SUBFRAME_SAMPLE_20_MASK     (0xfffff<<8)
> > > > +#define IEC958_SUBFRAME_VALIDITY   (0x1<<28)
> > > > +#define IEC958_SUBFRAME_USER_DATA  (0x1<<29)
> > > > +#define IEC958_SUBFRAME_CHANNEL_STATUS     (0x1<<30)
> > > > +#define IEC958_SUBFRAME_PARITY             (0x1<<31)
> > >
> > > I'd use "U" suffix as it can reach to the MSB.
> > > Also, you can put spaces around the operators to align with the
> > > standard format, too.  I guess you followed to the other code there,
> > > but following to the standard coding style would be better.
> > >
> > > With those addressed, feel free to take my ack for this patch:
> >
> > Or make use of the BIT() and GEN_MASK() helpers.
> 
> Is it acceptable to include the headers in this file?

It's no UAPI, so should be fine (although I'm no big fan of
GEN_MASK()).

Other definitions can be converted with the macros, but it should be a
different patch.


thanks,

Takashi