[PATCH v4 04/20] rust: add new `num` module with useful integer operations
Danilo Krummrich
dakr at kernel.org
Mon Jun 2 09:39:34 UTC 2025
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 09:27:33AM +0200, Benno Lossin wrote:
> That's also fair, but we lose the constness of `next_multiple_of`, so
> you can't use `align_up` in a const function. That might confuse people
> and then they write their own const helper function... I'd prefer we use
> all functions that are available in the stdlib.
Considering that, what's the suggestion for this trait?
I don't think we should have a trait with align_down() and fls() only and
otherwise use next_multiple_of(), i.e. mix things up.
I think we should either align with the Rust nomenclature - whatever this means
for fls() - or implement the trait with all three methods.
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list