[PATCH] drm/fourcc: Add RGB161616 and BGR161616 formats
Rob Clark
rob.clark at oss.qualcomm.com
Sat Jun 28 03:59:47 UTC 2025
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 12:10 PM Javier Martinez Canillas
<javierm at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 09:39:37AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 5:43 AM Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Add FourCC definitions for the 48-bit RGB/BGR formats to the
> >> > DRM/KMS uapi.
> >> >
> >> > The format will be used by the Raspberry Pi PiSP Back End,
> >> > supported by a V4L2 driver in kernel space and by libcamera in
> >> > userspace, which uses the DRM FourCC identifiers.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi at ideasonboard.com>
> >>
> >> Resurrecting this, as it appears to have not ever landed upstream
> >
> > What are the rule is for patches that touch core code like this one, can
> > they be pushed to drm-misc by anyone with commit access, or do they need
> > to be collected by a drm-misc maintainer ?
> >
>
> According to [0] I would say that you could just push it through drm-misc
> since there are already a few review-by tags collected.
>
> [0]: https://drm.pages.freedesktop.org/maintainer-tools/committer/committer-drm-misc.html#merge-criteria
yeah, should be fine to push to drm-misc since it has r-b's (not to
mention no negative comments for a _long_ time)
BR,
-R
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list