[PATCH 1/2] drm/sched: Fix outdated comments referencing thread

Philipp Stanner phasta at mailbox.org
Mon Mar 3 15:48:36 UTC 2025


On Tue, 2025-02-25 at 14:53 +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 02:13:32PM +0100, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > The GPU scheduler's comments refer to a "thread" at various places.
> > Those are leftovers stemming from a rework in which the scheduler
> > was
> 
> Maybe "leftovers from commit a6149f039369 ("drm/sched: Convert drm
> scheduler to
> use a work queue rather than kthread") [...]".
> 
> > ported from using a kthread to workqueues.
> > 
> > Replace all references to kthreads.
> > 
> > Fixes: a6149f039369 ("drm/sched: Convert drm scheduler to use a
> > work queue rather than kthread")
> 
> I suggest to drop the 'Fixes' tag, it's not a fix in the sense of
> this tag.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta at kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c |  8 ++++----
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c   | 21 +++++++++++---------
> > -
> >  include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h              | 12 ++++++------
> >  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> > index 87f88259ddf6..f9811420c787 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> > @@ -538,10 +538,10 @@ void drm_sched_entity_select_rq(struct
> > drm_sched_entity *entity)
> >  		return;
> >  
> >  	/*
> > -	 * Only when the queue is empty are we guaranteed that the
> > scheduler
> > -	 * thread cannot change ->last_scheduled. To enforce
> > ordering we need
> > -	 * a read barrier here. See drm_sched_entity_pop_job() for
> > the other
> > -	 * side.
> > +	 * Only when the queue is empty are we guaranteed that
> > +	 * drm_sched_run_job_work() cannot change entity-
> > >last_scheduled. To
> > +	 * enforce ordering we need a read barrier here. See
> > +	 * drm_sched_entity_pop_job() for the other side.
> >  	 */
> >  	smp_rmb();
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > index c634993f1346..015ee327fe52 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static void drm_sched_run_free_queue(struct
> > drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> >   * drm_sched_job_done - complete a job
> >   * @s_job: pointer to the job which is done
> >   *
> > - * Finish the job's fence and wake up the worker thread.
> > + * Finish the job's fence and wake up the work item.
> >   */
> >  static void drm_sched_job_done(struct drm_sched_job *s_job, int
> > result)
> >  {
> > @@ -550,8 +550,8 @@ static void drm_sched_job_timedout(struct
> > work_struct *work)
> >  	if (job) {
> >  		/*
> >  		 * Remove the bad job so it cannot be freed by
> > concurrent
> > -		 * drm_sched_cleanup_jobs. It will be reinserted
> > back after sched->thread
> 
> Not related to your patch, but I assume this means "cannot be freed
> by
> concurrent calls to drm_sched_job_cleanup()", which would still be
> incorrect,
> since drm_sched_job_cleanup() doesn't free the job itself. Maybe you
> want to fix
> this as well?
> 
> > -		 * is parked at which point it's safe.
> > +		 * drm_sched_cleanup_jobs. It will be reinserted
> > back after the
> > +		 * scheduler's workqueues are stopped at which
> > point it's safe.
> 
> You don't know whether the workqueues are "stopped". I think you want
> to say
> that run_job / free_job work isn't scheduled or running.

How about "after the scheduler's work items have been cancelled"?

P.

> 
> Same for a couple more instances below.
> 
> >  		 */
> >  		list_del_init(&job->list);
> >  		spin_unlock(&sched->job_list_lock);
> > @@ -597,10 +597,10 @@ void drm_sched_stop(struct drm_gpu_scheduler
> > *sched, struct drm_sched_job *bad)
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Reinsert back the bad job here - now it's safe as
> > -	 * drm_sched_get_finished_job cannot race against us and
> > release the
> > +	 * drm_sched_get_finished_job() cannot race against us and
> > release the
> 
> Not related to the patch, but fine for me, since you do it for
> consistency with
> the change below.
> 
> >  	 * bad job at this point - we parked (waited for) any in
> > progress
> > -	 * (earlier) cleanups and drm_sched_get_finished_job will
> > not be called
> > -	 * now until the scheduler thread is unparked.
> > +	 * (earlier) cleanups and drm_sched_get_finished_job()
> > will not be
> > +	 * called now until the scheduler's workqueues are
> > unparked.
> 
> workqueues are unparked?
> 
> >  	 */
> >  	if (bad && bad->sched == sched)
> >  		/*
> > @@ -613,7 +613,8 @@ void drm_sched_stop(struct drm_gpu_scheduler
> > *sched, struct drm_sched_job *bad)
> >  	 * Iterate the job list from later to  earlier one and
> > either deactive
> >  	 * their HW callbacks or remove them from pending list if
> > they already
> >  	 * signaled.
> > -	 * This iteration is thread safe as sched thread is
> > stopped.
> > +	 * This iteration is thread safe as the scheduler's
> > workqueues are
> > +	 * stopped.
> >  	 */
> >  	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(s_job, tmp, &sched-
> > >pending_list,
> >  					 list) {
> > @@ -678,9 +679,9 @@ void drm_sched_start(struct drm_gpu_scheduler
> > *sched, int errno)
> >  	struct drm_sched_job *s_job, *tmp;
> >  
> >  	/*
> > -	 * Locking the list is not required here as the sched
> > thread is parked
> > -	 * so no new jobs are being inserted or removed. Also
> > concurrent
> > -	 * GPU recovers can't run in parallel.
> > +	 * Locking the list is not required here as the
> > scheduler's workqueues
> > +	 * are paused, so no new jobs are being inserted or
> > removed. Also
> > +	 * concurrent GPU recovers can't run in parallel.
> >  	 */
> >  	list_for_each_entry_safe(s_job, tmp, &sched->pending_list,
> > list) {
> >  		struct dma_fence *fence = s_job->s_fence->parent;
> > diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> > b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> > index 50928a7ae98e..7da7b0b52a7e 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> > @@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ struct drm_sched_entity {
> >  	 * @last_scheduled:
> >  	 *
> >  	 * Points to the finished fence of the last scheduled job.
> > Only written
> > -	 * by the scheduler thread, can be accessed locklessly
> > from
> > -	 * drm_sched_job_arm() if the queue is empty.
> > +	 * by &struct drm_gpu_scheduler.submit_wq. Can be accessed
> > locklessly
> > +	 * from drm_sched_job_arm() if the queue is empty.
> >  	 */
> >  	struct dma_fence __rcu		*last_scheduled;
> >  
> > @@ -426,14 +426,14 @@ struct drm_sched_backend_ops {
> >  	 * Drivers typically issue a reset to recover from GPU
> > hangs, and this
> >  	 * procedure usually follows the following workflow:
> >  	 *
> > -	 * 1. Stop the scheduler using drm_sched_stop(). This will
> > park the
> > -	 *    scheduler thread and cancel the timeout work,
> > guaranteeing that
> > -	 *    nothing is queued while we reset the hardware queue
> > +	 * 1. Stop the scheduler using drm_sched_stop(). This will
> > stop the
> > +	 *    scheduler's workqueues and cancel the timeout work,
> > guaranteeing
> > +	 *    that  nothing is queued while we reset the hardware
> > queue
> >  	 * 2. Try to gracefully stop non-faulty jobs (optional)
> >  	 * 3. Issue a GPU reset (driver-specific)
> >  	 * 4. Re-submit jobs using drm_sched_resubmit_jobs()
> >  	 * 5. Restart the scheduler using drm_sched_start(). At
> > that point, new
> > -	 *    jobs can be queued, and the scheduler thread is
> > unblocked
> > +	 *    jobs can be queued, and the scheduler's workqueues
> > be started again.
> >  	 *
> >  	 * Note that some GPUs have distinct hardware queues but
> > need to reset
> >  	 * the GPU globally, which requires extra synchronization
> > between the
> > -- 
> > 2.48.1
> > 



More information about the dri-devel mailing list